| | Topic is locked |
| | Author | Messages | |
Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | 02/09/2007 10:59 AM |
| Cyrusprisoner has posted what he believes he has seen himself for unhallowed. He has been correct on at least two other unhallowed figures, and I figured I could start a speculation thread here. He is not sure what each of these are, but has described them.
[...snip...]
edited by LCS: The discussion of information that has been obtained by the breaking of an NDA (ie leaks), whether pictures or descriptions, is not allowed on maxminis.
I know that it can be hard to wait for more information, but we will know the complete set and probably have legal pictures in about a week from D&D XP.
Please do not repost the information here, do not post asking for the leaked information, or post regarding how that information might be obtained outside of maxminis.
| | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of a Medium Dog & then a Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Frost Giant in Dangerous Delves. | |
|  Lead Moderator LCS Underboss
 1928 Posts




 | | 02/09/2007 3:29 PM |
| The topic of WotC leaks has recently been discussed in a thread on hordelings, and one post by jgsugden does a very good job of covering why we have the policy that we do:
Posted by jgsugden
To me, it comes down to respect. Not for WotC, but for the people that work there. They frequent these boards and are a member of this community. We enjoy their posts and humor. They are equals amongst our internet friends - and deserve our respect and cooperation.
One of the joys of their job is getting to preview and release information about the sets. They have a plan for how to release the information. They spend a lot of time figuring out how to best release the information to insure that everyone is intrigued throughout the preview process, and at the time that the full stats are released.
When people steal information from WotC and post it prematurely, they steal the thunder of the WotC people. It is the equivalent of finding out what a friend intends to give to someone else on that person's birthday, and then telling the birthday person that they are going to receive. If that happened to me, as a gift giver, I'd be pretty disappointed.
However, WotC employees seem to realize that if there are leaks, there is not much that can be done to contain them. They can control the leaks on the WotC boards. They could ask that the major independent boards not allow the leaks to be posted. However, they seem to realize that smaller independent entities will distribute the information once it hits the internet, regardless of what they do. Accordingly, they have not gone overboard in trying to stop people from posting the information, although they have made it clear that it is very disappointing to them when it is posted.
The spread of information relating to leaks is much faster if that information spends some time on Maxminis or Hordelings. Although there are other equally effective methods of releasing the information, the majority of the major leaks have begun on Maxminis and Hordelings. If these boards were not involved in the leaks, the spread would have been much slower...
For my part - as a matter of respect for the people that work at WotC, I want to stop the people that post these spoilers from posting them. If it is posted and we can slow the spread of the information a bit by keeping them off the major boards and seeing if they still proliferate, I'm all for it. However, once a spoiler is out there, I'm more than happy to seek it out. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
I recognize that certain pieces of information can have an economic effect on people. If there were a leak that an uncommon fiendish umber hulk were in Unhallowed, people that have 2 to 5 Harbinger Umber Hulks ("HUHs") might try to sell some of their HUHs before the information was widely available. in those situations, where there is a substantial financial impact that can be anticipated, I see some reason in allowing the information to remain on the major boards. Despite the 'spoiled present' aspect of a leak, there are competing factors in those situations that require attention. However, unless the value of the older figure averages more than ~$30 on Ebay, I don't think that should be a factor.
If you want to read more of the discussion, it can be found inthis thread on hordelings.
| | | |
| Harneloot Sergeant
 575 Posts




 | | 02/09/2007 9:06 PM |
| Blah blah blah....i still don't see how us talking about and posintg info on leaks hurts WoTC employees. We're really suppose to NOT talk about and NOT post leaked material? Because we owe a company and the people that work there something?
This is the only fan base that this quirk exists in. Video Games, Sports, Comics, Technology, Finance - its all about the latest rumor and inside info. I still don't get how/why Hasbro/WoTC gets a special deflection modifier on this.
As someone has previously mentioned, Merric's site and Maxminis use to be THE places to go for the lates/greatest info on Minis. Now? We're Embedded with the corporation..... | | "What is to give light must endure burning" -Viktor Frankl
Champion of the Large Myconid
Deacon of the ANY aligned Raistlin. | |
| Low Key Underboss
 1231 Posts




 | | 02/09/2007 11:12 PM |
| Posted By Harneloot on 02/09/2007 9:06 PM Now? We're Embedded with the corporation.....
And this is the very reason the leak policy is in place. The fact that we have WotC employees and DDM designers actively participating in the community is a far greater boon then seeing leaks a few weeks/months early.
I'd rather have "Ask WotC a question" thread instead of another greenback. | | Champion of the Sarrukh | |
| cyrusprisoner Skirmisher
 34 Posts



 | | 02/10/2007 1:04 AM |
| | ok, i will not post any more information about the coming and future mini | | | |
| Dordledum Commander
 3463 Posts



 Netherlands
 | | 02/10/2007 4:04 AM |
| fair enough,
I don't agree with the rules and the logic behind them, but if those are the rules, those are the rules.
At least be consistent, and remove the list with leaks from all threads it was published in.
Even now there is still a thread on the main page which features all names of yesterday's leaks.
D. | | Member of the Bearded Devils Champion of the Huge Spider (WotDQ 46/60), A New Umber Hulk (DoDe 57/60), and the Orog Fighter! | |
| PaSquall Underboss
 1399 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 5:48 AM |
| Posted By Harneloot on 02/09/2007 9:06 PM
This is the only fan base that this quirk exists in. Video Games, Sports, Comics, Technology, Finance - its all about the latest rumor and inside info. I still don't get how/why Hasbro/WoTC gets a special deflection modifier on this.
QFT.
All this fuss about a leak where cyrusprisoner only gave vague descriptions of some minis is pretty stupid. Frankly. Not even a pic or a skirmish stat was posted...
| | Vindicated Champion of the PSEUDODRAGON (Unhappy) vindicated champion of the DRYAD Against the giants called shot : huge cloud giant female Demonweb called shot : ghost | |
| sage_raistlin Sergeant
 377 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 6:54 AM |
| Stupid stupid stupid. The whole point of sites like this it to get information about upcoming releases/rumors. If you guess are going to act like the Gestapo about it, then then it changes the entire idea of the site.
This should be a site to freely publish infomation about figure. If somoene breaks a NDA, as Mods it's not up to you to enforce it. The figures for the next two sets are most likely being made right now. If somone in the factory sees/reads them and posts about them, so be it. We are talking about figures, not national security issues that need to be keep secret. If the factory were stateside, we'd now about the figures almost the instant they were made. The list the was released was so vague and had no picutes that it is stupid to jump on it and delete. Mods are over reacting to the whole leaks situation period.
All this does is hurt the community as a whole, people are going to be afraid to post info/rumors for fear of the Mods banning them, just because they don't want to offend WOTC. Leaks and rumors can have a positive effect on preorders and excitement in reguards to prereleases. If I have seen the whole set or close to it a few weeks before release, it will tempt me to preorder more before the release.
Mods, you need to lay off the gestapo tactics and allow this community to do what it is ment to do. Have open and honest disscussions about what we love best. WOTC need to understand this community is not employed by them and in this current time everything will get out and leak. If they are going to be aggressive about it towards message boards on the internet, then it's it going to end up hurting the company as a whole and give them negative PR. Just look at Games Workshop and how their aggressive greed has had a major impact on the company overall sales.
I'm sure my post will last all of five mins before this gets taken down and I get banned, but you know what. I'm tired of the whole walking on eggshells and this needed to be said. | | Hello Boys, I'm Back Vindicated Champion of the Bat (not pretty, but it still counts) | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 6:59 AM |
| | I will post spoilers on my site. If you have any, send them to me. Cheers. | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of a Medium Dog & then a Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Frost Giant in Dangerous Delves. | |
| Gallandv Sneak
 73 Posts


 Lafayette, La.
 | | 02/10/2007 7:30 AM |
| I guess throw me on the I don't care if I get banned wagon. I think the stopping of verbal information is ludicrous at best.
If you cannot discuss information garnered then there is no need for this site. This site is a place where posters can remove themselves from the WOTC authority and post, within the spectrum of good taste, what they have thought and found without concerns to WOTC.
If you can fool yourselves into thinking that they come for the "Ask WOTC Column" then great for you. In reality people come here in hopes of obtaining an early glimpse of possible things to come in the collection they devote there money too. Now this site does not make money from us viewers and can in fact choose to put or allow what they want on the site.
I for one have never read the "Ask WOTC Column" because it holds no interest to me. Until WOTC starts leaking future info here then it means nothing to me. All of the other input they leave here seams to be reposts of what they have stated on the WOTC site. My question to the site administrator is why did he feal the need for this site when he left WOTC. I thought it was a place to trade and garner early information. There is trading on the WOTC site and they even police such early information. If they do why is this site needed.
I come to this site when I am at work because of firewalls. I guess I will have to try Hordelings for info and see if they are as uptight. | | | |
| Darkfather Commander
 3468 Posts



 Queensland, Australia
 | | 02/10/2007 7:54 AM |
| Posted By Gallandv on 02/10/2007 7:30 AM I guess I will have to try Hordelings for info and see if they are as uptight.
Prepare to be very dissapointed then. They have the same policies towards un-official leaks.
DF
| | [INSERT WITTY QUOTE HERE] 233 Confirmed Trades, 230 Completed Trades, 3 Failed TradesChampion of Dark Mantles | |
| Anaxagoras Warrior
 318 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 9:34 AM |
| I would like to further add my utter disappointment towards Maxminis in regards to this situation. I have posted a few spoilers in the past, but will not do so again.
| | | |
| Harneloot Sergeant
 575 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 9:41 AM |
| | Maybe the Mods are getting secret Mini kickbacks for playing the role of WoTC Watchdogs! | | "What is to give light must endure burning" -Viktor Frankl
Champion of the Large Myconid
Deacon of the ANY aligned Raistlin. | |
| hazel monday Warrior
 338 Posts



 Baltimore MD
 | | 02/10/2007 9:52 AM |
| | Come on now.
We all owe WOTC a great debt. They make minis we like and charge us nothing for them. The least we can do is subvert the main purpose of this site to accomodate them.
Now if they were charging us money for the minis, then we'd be within our rights not to worry abut third party NDAs and such stuff.
...Hey, wait a minute... | | Champion of Phanatons. | |
| gausse Sergeant
 961 Posts



 Wisconsin
 | | 02/10/2007 6:29 PM |
| Posted By sage_raistlin on 02/10/2007 6:54 AM Stupid stupid stupid. The whole point of sites like this it to get information about upcoming releases/rumors. If you guess are going to act like the Gestapo about it, then then it changes the entire idea of the site.
This should be a site to freely publish infomation about figure. If somoene breaks a NDA, as Mods it's not up to you to enforce it. The figures for the next two sets are most likely being made right now. If somone in the factory sees/reads them and posts about them, so be it. We are talking about figures, not national security issues that need to be keep secret. If the factory were stateside, we'd now about the figures almost the instant they were made. The list the was released was so vague and had no picutes that it is stupid to jump on it and delete. Mods are over reacting to the whole leaks situation period.
All this does is hurt the community as a whole, people are going to be afraid to post info/rumors for fear of the Mods banning them, just because they don't want to offend WOTC. Leaks and rumors can have a positive effect on preorders and excitement in reguards to prereleases. If I have seen the whole set or close to it a few weeks before release, it will tempt me to preorder more before the release.
Mods, you need to lay off the gestapo tactics and allow this community to do what it is ment to do. Have open and honest disscussions about what we love best. WOTC need to understand this community is not employed by them and in this current time everything will get out and leak. If they are going to be aggressive about it towards message boards on the internet, then it's it going to end up hurting the company as a whole and give them negative PR. Just look at Games Workshop and how their aggressive greed has had a major impact on the company overall sales.
I'm sure my post will last all of five mins before this gets taken down and I get banned, but you know what. I'm tired of the whole walking on eggshells and this needed to be said.
I have to agree. I have been a long time participant of this site and active trader. This policy is LAME at best in my opinion and makes me think much less of the site. Is the site owned and operated by Wotc now? Wotc already has its own site. The whole set will be available very shortly and there were no pics or real details. It just peaked peoples interest. It was bascially good clean fun, hate the new overprotective atmosphere. | | 270+ Trades Completed (194 maxminis | 50 wizards | 29 hordelings) References: http://www.maxminis.com/Forums/tabid/104/view/topic/forumid/53/postid/435268/Default.aspx H/W List: http://www.maxminis.com/hwlist.asp?user=gausse Bad Trades: Chaotic Good (Strongbow Lone Eagle), dndonuts, Allard, ScottWallace Email: gausse2@yahoo.com
| |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 02/10/2007 10:25 PM |
| Posted By sage_raistlin on 02/10/2007 6:54 AM Stupid stupid stupid. The whole point of sites like this it to get information about upcoming releases/rumors. If you guess are going to act like the Gestapo about it, then then it changes the entire idea of the site.
Wow. Godwin's law already invoked.
C'mon, let's not overreact here. Let's look at what's occured: The Mods have politely stated their opinion and their reasons behind it. They have not banned any accounts nor removed any posts stating displeasure over this position. If they wanted to shut down discussion they would have locked down the thread, but it's now two days from when it started and it's still there.
If this is so intolerable then make your own site. In the end it is the owners and moderators of boards who set the ground rules. Again, so far no one has said that you can't say anything contrary to the rules. On the contrary, so far the mods have allowed every negative comment.
I'm sure my post will last all of five mins before this gets taken down and I get banned, but you know what. I'm tired of the whole walking on eggshells and this needed to be said.Â
Nope still there. Check out the Moved and Locked Accunts thread and see just how often and what reasons they ban accounts. It's not that often and you have to be pretty egrecious to have that course of action.
| | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | 02/10/2007 10:34 PM |
| | For those of you asking, I will post the list in question tomorrow on my own site. No need to involve maxminis. | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of a Medium Dog & then a Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Frost Giant in Dangerous Delves. | |
| Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 7908 Posts



 Sector 2814
 | | 02/10/2007 11:07 PM |
| I guess I think this is a bit ludicrous. yes, there needs to eb some sort of control on leaks. It affects WotC employees when there are problems. But a list describing Minis? That's a aguessing game, and if anythign, helps people, as now they want to go buy some and see what that [mini description deleted] ended up being. I agree, this is an overreaction.
If this were another Greenback situation, I would agree. But it's not, it's a very vague description of some minis he saw. We don't even know he broke an NDA. perhaps he went on a tour of WotC and saw them laying on a desk, and took some fuzzy cell Phone pictures.
So, in short, Overreaction.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon "Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
|  Prince o the Raven Banner Sergeant
 606 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 1:17 AM |
| Posted By Harneloot on 02/10/2007 9:41 AM Maybe the Mods are getting secret Mini kickbacks for playing the role of WoTC Watchdogs!
Oh sweet baby I wish! I'd take out the whole internet for enough minis. Though, then I wouldn't have anywhere to brag about it. | | Two trades completed!! (Krush,Hides From Hurricanes) Champion of the Aaracokra Herald Of Snig Goblin King | |
| Dargoth Underboss
 1274 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 1:29 AM |
| Posted By greyhaze on 02/10/2007 10:34 PM For those of you asking, I will post the list in question tomorrow on my own site. No need to involve maxminis.
Viva la Greyhaze! | | Champion of the Zhentarim: Manshoon, Fzoul and Scyllua Darkhope | |
| Sirohk Commander
 3938 Posts



 USA
 | | 02/11/2007 4:10 AM |
| Posted By Prince o the Raven Banner on 02/11/2007 1:17 AM Posted By Harneloot on 02/10/2007 9:41 AM Maybe the Mods are getting secret Mini kickbacks for playing the role of WoTC Watchdogs! Oh sweet baby I wish! I'd take out the whole internet for enough minis. Though, then I wouldn't have anywhere to brag about it. If it were true, then everyone would want to be a Mod! Â
The policy is what it is. This time the "leak" is a list describing possible mini's (and very likely mini's from Unhallowed). So IMO it is kind of on the fence with respect to what a leak is, but nowhere near the magnitude of the WotDQ greenback leak. But to keep this site to the highest possible standards, the policy has to be invoked universally. The mods made their call on this one and the info is no more (except that Greyhaze is going to put it up on his site, go Greyhaze go).Â
So, for those for the brief time it was here, you saw a peak at some possible Unhallowed min's. We just can't discuss them here. On the otherhand, almost everyone will know the complete set in about a week, shortly after XP.Â
 | | Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone Knight of the Rahshasa's And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's | |
| Humble Minion Sneak
 121 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 5:51 AM |
| In the end, it's the mods decision as to Maxminis' spoiler policy, and they're entirely within their rights to make it whatever they like. I still reckon they're going about it the wrong way though.
Apparently this restriction on spoiler posting is the price we pay for WotC participation at Maxminis. To be brutally honest, I'm not sure that what we're getting is worth the price. There's been approximately two answers posted to the WotC Question Thread in the past six weeks, for instance. And many, many questions (particularly the more thorny ones about WotDQ Blackguard booster art, War Drums paint jobs, the presence of Bluespawn Godslayers in our precious and infrequent Huge slots, Marilith sculpts, scale creep, quality control and the like) remain completely unanswered or receive some deeply unsatisfactory and uninformative response that smacks more of WotCs legal department than of the creative team.
Now, my perspective is almost certainly biased since I'm a RPer, and there is a much higher rate of WotC response to skirmish-related questions (tourny details, mini legality, maps, Guy's rulings, etc, etc) than there is to questions of interest to me (mini subject selection, paint jobs, rarities, etc). A skirmisher would almost certainly get more out of WotCs presence here than i do. But (and I'm not pointing the finger at Shoe and Lidda at all here - I'm sure they have online-behaviour rules laid down by higher-ups that they are obliged to follow like it or not) in my opinion, to justify the community forfeiting spoilers in this way, WotC would need to actually *participate* in the community, be involved, answer reasonable questions honestly (I can understand a certain degree of secrecy being necessary, but I personally believe it's being overdone, particularly when it comes to explaining the whys of past design decisions rather than dropping hints about future products), and take part in give and take. There's a long way between 'participation in the community' and 'Maxminis as marketing venue we don't have to pay for', and I'd like to see WotC doing the former a little more often if we're going to forfeit spoilers on their behalf. Quid pro quo and all that... | | My Have/Want list: http://www.maxminis.com/hw_list.asp?user=Humble%20Minion Trade reference thread: http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12743 | |
| warty_nosed_goblin Underboss
 1384 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 6:54 AM |
| Can't say as the overall policy bothers me, since we will know everything that's in a set sooner or later, and frankly the hype is more enjoyable (at least to me) then the actual knowledge is. Also, I can't think of a good reason that we should want to do something that deliberately harms WoTC and their fine employees who actually post here- just to know a few figures a few weeks early, it seems a little rude at least to me.
That said, this time the application of the policy seems a little draconian, since the set is out so soon and its not exactly a very specific leak...but if this is the price of a policy I overall agree with, then so be it. | | Call me: W.N. Gobo! originally posted by grim: While he is clearly insane, he does have a point. | |
| Harneloot Sergeant
 575 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 7:37 AM |
| Well said Humbel Minion.
Is Hordelings as oppressive as Maxminis has become? Maybe its finally time to migrate... | | "What is to give light must endure burning" -Viktor Frankl
Champion of the Large Myconid
Deacon of the ANY aligned Raistlin. | |
| Knight of Argenis Corim Danex Warlord
 6843 Posts



 West Valley City, Utah
 | | 02/11/2007 8:16 AM |
| Posted By Harneloot on 02/11/2007 7:37 AM Well said Humbel Minion.
Is Hordelings as oppressive as Maxminis has become? Maybe its finally time to migrate... They have pretty much the same standards. The post that LCS quoted from jgsugden near the beginning of this thread was posted on hordelings and accepted by the main moderator there. I don't know how strictly the policy is to be enforced (like removing discussion of cyrusprisoner's list), because I haven't noticed if that list was brought up there or not.
In other words, the standards are pretty close to the same, but I don't know the exact answer to that question.
| | "Look to God and live." Alma 37:47 Vindicated Champ of Hippogriff (Arcadian Hippogriff) and Uncommon Horse | |
| sfgiants Sneak
 96 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 8:20 AM |
| | I am pretty much a lurker here but this really chokes me. What is the point of this site if not for spoilers etc for ddm? In all honesty WotC rarely contributes to the site and even rarer still contributes something of value. It seems strange and makes me wonder if something else isn't at work here. Anyways, the policy is pretty lame. |
| http://www.maxminis.com/hw_list.asp?user=sfgiants | |
| Stormhand Skirmisher
 21 Posts



 | | 02/11/2007 9:16 AM |
| Here's my personal point of view.....
My guess is it all comes down to money. WotC generate revenues by "selling" some exclusive previews to magazines or other commercial vehicules. If the people behind the game cannot generate enough revenues and make this line of product profitable, then Hasbrow, owner of WotC, could decide to end that line of product and possibly cut all jobs related to it. I'm certain that this is the last thing employees would want, hence their request to minimize the publication of leaks by the various fan sites so that they may generate as much other revenues as possible to make it worthwhile.
I don't know if you've seen the latest financial results of Hasbrow. They made a very nice profit which was led by increased revenues in products unrelated to WotC, hence certainly not related to DDM. So my guess is that if DDM is not a profitable line, it will be abandoned sooner than later. And since there is a big event coming this week, I'd assume WotC would want as many people as possible to attend and have a first real peak at the coming collection. Again, it all comes down to money.
I could be wrong, obviously...... But since I work in a financial environnement, I tend to analyse a lot of companies' decisions based on return on investments and the likes. It's certainly not something important for the majority of fans and/or players, but it's extreemly important for the investors, and thus on higher management.
Can I wait a little longuer to find out what's in the next collection if it means the game can last longuer in terms of production? Certainly. But that's only me...... | | | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | warty_nosed_goblin Underboss
 1384 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 10:07 AM |
| Posted By Stormhand on 02/11/2007 9:16 AM Here's my personal point of view.....
My guess is it all comes down to money. WotC generate revenues by "selling" some exclusive previews to magazines or other commercial vehicules. If the people behind the game cannot generate enough revenues and make this line of product profitable, then Hasbrow, owner of WotC, could decide to end that line of product and possibly cut all jobs related to it. I'm certain that this is the last thing employees would want, hence their request to minimize the publication of leaks by the various fan sites so that they may generate as much other revenues as possible to make it worthwhile.
I don't know if you've seen the latest financial results of Hasbrow. They made a very nice profit which was led by increased revenues in products unrelated to WotC, hence certainly not related to DDM. So my guess is that if DDM is not a profitable line, it will be abandoned sooner than later. And since there is a big event coming this week, I'd assume WotC would want as many people as possible to attend and have a first real peak at the coming collection. Again, it all comes down to money.
I could be wrong, obviously...... But since I work in a financial environnement, I tend to analyse a lot of companies' decisions based on return on investments and the likes. It's certainly not something important for the majority of fans and/or players, but it's extreemly important for the investors, and thus on higher management.
Can I wait a little longuer to find out what's in the next collection if it means the game can last longuer in terms of production? Certainly. But that's only me......
Well said. | | Call me: W.N. Gobo! originally posted by grim: While he is clearly insane, he does have a point. | |
| berus316 Sergeant
 663 Posts



 Markham, Ontario Canada
 | | 02/11/2007 10:25 AM |
| Lame.
Simple and Honest.
Thanks Greyhaze. | | Champion of the Aspect of Gruumsh Nemesis of Gnomes and Warforged
References http://maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12304 H/W List http://www.maxminis.com/hw_list.asp?user=berus316 | |
| Oryan77 Sergeant
 959 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 10:37 AM |
| I don't get it.
I honestly can't think of a good reason why the company would care if a
spoiler picture pops up every so often. It's less work they have to
spend to show off their new product, and it's free advertising. If they
are making quality products, they have nothing to worry about. Even if
they have a show and want to promote the new stuff, people will still
want to hear about it even if they've seen pictures.
Now people can't even write up descriptions of new products that can't
even be proven as true since there's no picture to back up their claim?
That's strange to me. Discussing the product is part of a fan site.
Not to sound disrespectful, but I've visited this site for almost 2
years and I've never once saw a DDM representative from WotC post
something here about DDM that made me think "wow, we're a lucky
community to be able to get special info about DDM". I don't skirmish
so I apologize if I'm wrong and there has been skirmish info that only
maxminis members were first to hear about, but as a collector/RPGer,
I've never read any special information from a DDM representative. All
I've ever seen were more teasers from them. For example, it's not big
news to hear "We don't recognize the secondary market, the new Drizzt
Icon set may or may not affect the Archfiends Drizzt".
Again, no disrespect meant for either maxminis or WotC employees that
post here. I just don't understand this hooplah about spoilers and
saying the community needs to show WotC respect. It's a fan site,
ruining surprises is what we do! How is that bad?
Actually, if we're so lucky to have WotC people visit this site, can
one of you WotC guys please explain to me why spoilers are a bane to
your company? That's an honest question, I'm really curious. It may
make sense to me and then I'll be on your side; telling people to stop
posting those darn spoilers!
| | Miniatures for sale *more added 11/26/08*: Click here I will buy your unwanted D&D WotC minis collection (DDM only). Email me your asking price! | |
| Sirohk Commander
 3938 Posts



 USA
 | | 02/11/2007 12:50 PM |
| Posted By greyhaze on 02/11/2007 10:05 AM List is posted. Cheers. Greyhaze - Where is the list posted? I click on your link to your spoilers and I can't find them there. I can't find a link to another Greyhaze page either.Â
Any little help please.Â
Thanks.Â
 | | Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone Knight of the Rahshasa's And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's | |
| Harneloot Sergeant
 575 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 1:14 PM |
| Stormhand:
Wouldn't WotC PAY Scry and Dragon and Inquest and whoever else to advertise their product in those magazines, not the other way around? Also, if these magazines are paying WotC for the right to publish pictures first, before the set is released, how much $$$ is that really going to generate compared to overall mini sales? A very very small percentage i would suspect.
I'd like to hear the owner of the site chime in with his opinion rather than just the moderators... | | "What is to give light must endure burning" -Viktor Frankl
Champion of the Large Myconid
Deacon of the ANY aligned Raistlin. | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 7737 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 1:48 PM |
| If a magazine is given an exclusive the magazine might be able to sell more copies of that particular issue. When the exclusive is stolen away by spoilers, it no longer has that particular alure to offer a potential purchaser.
Sirohk:Â http://www.ddmspoilers.com/unh_stats.html is the link, try refreshing while holding down shift. It is in the grey area at the top, it is text only. | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of a Medium Dog & then a Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Frost Giant in Dangerous Delves. | |
| Sirohk Commander
 3938 Posts



 USA
 | | 02/11/2007 2:00 PM |
| Posted By greyhaze on 02/11/2007 1:48 PM If a magazine is given an exclusive the magazine might be able to sell more copies of that particular issue. When the exclusive is stolen away by spoilers, it no longer has that particular alure to offer a potential purchaser. Sirohk:Â http://www.ddmspoilers.com/unh_stats.html is the link, try refreshing while holding down shift. It is in the grey area at the top, it is text only. Thanks.Â

| | Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone Knight of the Rahshasa's And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's | |
|  Bert the Troll Commander
 3964 Posts



 Adelaide
 | | 02/11/2007 2:50 PM |
| Some notes/thoughts:
- I normally obey Godwin's law and will in future. - Don't be surpised if this thread, or other like it find themselves in Forums Discussion. Like with other threads I will keep it here a while for people to notice that I intend on moving it. - No-one has ever been banned for stating thier opinion of maxmini's rules. It makes for nice rhetoric in your post, but is quite untrue. Be polite and discuss without the comparisons that mods are genocidal torturers becasue you have a different viewpoint. - If you want more input or clarification about spoiler policy, make a thread in Forums Discussion. - If you're only reason for visiting Maxminis is to get spoiler information then there is a lot of Maxminis you are missing out on. BTW, just in case you missed it, Greyhazes site has them. - Threats of leaving Maxminis for Hordelings is vastly over estimating intrasite friction if you are expecting a reaction, or that your whim will suddenly be obeyed. - I agree we need a more clearly defined policy. EG things like the scrye magazine were acceptable spoiler, Warden of Wood too, People getting early boosters of underdark was another :| As I stated on last thread similar to this, The maxmini policy is not written in stone, it is evolving and there will be errors of judgement to both extremes along the way.
'nuf said?
| | "Mutton yesterday, mutton today, and blimey, if it don't look like mutton again tomorrer." Bert the Troll - The Hobbit Semi-Secret sig business: "In the age of the internet attaching a famous name to your personal opinion to give more weight to it is a very valid strategy." - Benjamin Franklin Champion of Epic Lolth, Orcus, & Demogorgon and bring us Asmodeus! | |
|  Avatar of the Irrelevant Diomedes Commander
 3185 Posts




 | | 02/11/2007 5:35 PM |
| Whoops, just swinging by, I wish I had time to finish reading the thread, but my wife and I are playing Neverwinter 2 at the moment and she's hollering for me to get back.
I'm sort of surprised that other people are surprised by this. I joined maxminis in.... Oct or Nov 2003? This has been a policy on these boards since I joined. While I'm not always clear on why WotC is so against early leaks, they really are. In fact, a lot of companies that are huge on Intellectual Property get very touchy about leaks. Heck Apple computers attempted to sue an apple rumor site a while back over a leak (although I believe they dropped their lawsuit). So while I wish they felt differently, they have a very defined position opposing leaks.
Further, I am not a lawyer (IANAL) but if maxminis /did/ post leaks, couldn't WotC demand we remove them under the DMCA? I'm not saying that's why maxminis has our policy (it's the webmaster/lcs's call I believe) but it is food for thought.
Anyhow, I'll drop by again in a bit, but I'm getting yelled at to unpause 
Peace, Diomedes | | | |
| Star Sergeant
 978 Posts



 New Britain, CT
 | | 02/11/2007 10:31 PM |
| Bert - Thanks for chiming in. I look forward to a post or thread concerning a clearly defined policy on leaks - even if it is subject to change.
To be honest I disagree with the policy as it seems to be at this point. I'm a reasonable person though and would at least like to know why the policy exists. There's likely a good reason for it and knowing that reason may make it easier for people to accept - if not agree with. | | Champion of Gromph Baenre | |
| Dordledum Commander
 3463 Posts



 Netherlands
 | | 02/12/2007 6:01 AM |
| Personally, I understand the policy on green/redback pictures and stats . But IMHO this is extremely a case of overreacting on the part of the respective moderators.
We are dealing here with some very vague descriptions on possible miniatures somebody might have seen. Where does speculation change into leaking?
no offense meant, but: come on! give us a break.
D.
| | Member of the Bearded Devils Champion of the Huge Spider (WotDQ 46/60), A New Umber Hulk (DoDe 57/60), and the Orog Fighter! | |
| lingster Sergeant
 778 Posts




 | | 02/12/2007 6:23 AM |
| true enough. Speculation is not the same as a downright leak.
Now if the minis were not partially described, but pics shown, then YES< it's a leak.
If I started a discussion on a miniature with 4 legs and a top-hat, then would that be considered a leak??? How would you know that I didn't get the info from some legit channel? or that I made it all up?
It's over-reacting here for this. | | May you find peace and happiness at the hand of Hextor.
Champion of Black Pudding Called Shot Desert of Desolation: Drider - VINDICATED! Called Shot Demonweb: Drow Cleric of Lloth Called Shot FeyWild: Water Nymph (06-26-08)
Member of Team Millennium
4E takes away our Big Bad Evil Guy (BBEG) and give us this:
The Big Bad Mis-Understood But Not Quite Inherently Evil Who Does Naughty Things Guy (BBMUBNQIEWDNTG for short) | |
|
| | Topic is locked |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.7 | You must be signed in to participate in the
games. |