Search
Sunday, September 07, 2008..:: Forums::..Register  Login
Subject: "Set Rotation"

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 41234 > >>
AuthorMessages

stephengroy
Underboss
Underboss
1364 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Tempe AZ Beeyotch

01/24/2008 8:54 AM  
http://www.hordelings.com/forums/postView.php?post_id=127368&viewPage=0

“Set Rotation”

A nice way of saying our purchases are going to be useless.

Gee, Thanks HASBRO


Waiting for Chainmail Equivalencies since 2005

warchanter
Sergeant
Sergeant
354 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Italy

01/24/2008 9:29 AM  
They've applied the "Magic" Treatment to DDM. Not a surprise, after all.

Nexxstalker on WoTC Boards

Wraithborne
Commander
Commander
3546 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

West Virginia

01/24/2008 9:33 AM  
And this'll prolly change again as soon as someone there gets another idea. Give it a couple months and nothing in that announcement will be accurate whatsoever.

They are determined to try and find a way to force set rotation on us and this one isn't as bad as the previous attempt. I'm glad I'm getting rid of my non rpg essentials.

In all honesty, if given the choice I would prefer the old cards not to get redone and have a supported vintage format that uses the old cards and ruleset.

The year: 1994. From out of space comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction! Man's civilization is cast in ruin!
Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn...
A strange new world rises from the old: a world of savagery, super science, and sorcery. But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice! With his companions Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword against the forces of evil.
He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!

Wraithborne
Commander
Commander
3546 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

West Virginia

01/24/2008 9:40 AM  
On the bright side, we'll get full tournament support for the Vintage format.
Never heard anything about promised support before, have we Dreamblade fans?

The year: 1994. From out of space comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction! Man's civilization is cast in ruin!
Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn...
A strange new world rises from the old: a world of savagery, super science, and sorcery. But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice! With his companions Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword against the forces of evil.
He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 9:47 AM  
Mind reposting the announcement or whatever?

I am not gone.

Vrecknidj
Warlord
Warlord
10301 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

United States

01/24/2008 10:21 AM  
Link

It's been a wait -- one fraught with speculation, anticipation, trepidation, and misinformation -- and now, revelation. The first set of updated D&D Miniatures cards are ready to be unveiled, inspected, and playtested. This is the public's first shot at trying out the new incarnation of D&D Miniatures. There's bound to be plenty of buzz. Don't get left out -- download your set now!

If you don't have the rulebook yet, you'll need that, too.

Obviously, we'll have a lot more to say about this in the future. For now, we just want you to read the rules, inspect the cards, and most of all -- play the game! Then pop over to the forums to let everyone know how it went and read others' evaluations. We think you'll find it's a fast, exciting, and intuitive game, with enough of the 'old feel' to be a new yet familiar experience.

The retail version of the game debuts in April with the Dungeon of Dread expansion. Existing miniatures will receive new stats to make them compatible with the new rules according to this schedule (which is subject to change) --

* January 2008: Desert of Desolation
* March 2008: Night Below
* April 2008: Dungeons of Dread Release
* May 2008: Unhallowed
* June 2008: Fan-selected All-Stars

And remember, all Desert of Desolation creatures will appear in the 4th edition D&D Monster Manual, and you'll be able to download their updated stats for the new D&D Miniatures rules in January 2008!

Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing;
My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right!

Vrecknidj
Warlord
Warlord
10301 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

United States

01/24/2008 10:23 AM  
Note the sentence which says "...inspect the cards."

I hope that they mean that this means that they're going to take suggestions and fix the errors that have been found so far.

The pile of errors is alarmingly huge.

Hordelings Link

Dave

Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing;
My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right!
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 10:31 AM  
Could you repost that also, please? I remember seeing errors that Guy listed that I did not see, and I want to make sure I am not just misremembering.

I am not gone.
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 10:32 AM  
Also, I meant the vintage tournament announcement, not the new cards one.

I am not gone.

Wraithborne
Commander
Commander
3546 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

West Virginia

01/24/2008 10:45 AM  
Starting on April 15th, 2008, the DCI adds a new format to Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game tournament play.

The new format, known as the Standard format, creates a more dynamic metagame and gives newer players better access to tournament game play. The Standard format uses all miniatures from the two most recent calendar years, plus the All-Star set of miniatures selected from earlier sets.

The current format, allowing miniatures from any expansion that has received its official update, remains a significant part of tournament play and will now be called Vintage.

Both the Standard and Vintage formats will use the new D&D Miniatures rules published on the Wizards of the Coast website in January 2008 (and available for purchase with the D&D Miniatures Starter Game in April 2008), and the updated stat cards for each expansion after they become available (see schedule below). Only models with updated stat cards published by Wizards of the Coast are legal in sanctioned play.

When the Standard format debuts in April, it will include the updated miniatures for Unhallowed and Desert of Desolation, as well as the newly published Dungeon of Dread. Miniatures from Night Below will be added to the Standard format on June 1; see the schedule below for the rest of the 2008 Standard rotation schedule.

The Standard format will be used for all 2008 qualifier tournaments leading up to the D&D Miniatures Standard Championship at Gen Con Indy 2008.

Players with large collections can continue to use their miniatures in Vintage tournaments—an important part of DDM organized play. The Vintage format includes championship-level events, with the first Vintage championship taking place at D&D Experience in 2009. More details on Vintage events will be announced as they become available.

In addition to supporting Vintage tournaments, Wizards of the Coast is committed to the promise that “you can bring your plastic with you” into the next edition of the Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game by announcing that all sets will be updated to the new version of the D&D Miniatures rules. The schedule for these updates will be announced shortly.

Standard Rotation Schedule for 2008

April 15: Standard format debuts with Unhallowed, Desert of Desolation, and Dungeons of Dread.
June 1: Night Below rotates into Standard (using updated stats published online in May).
July 4: Against the Giants rotates into Standard.
August 1: All-Star set rotates into Standard (using updated stats published online in July).
November 7: Demonweb rotates into Standard.
Some Frequently Asked Questions:

Q. Can I still use my old miniatures?

A. Absolutely. Sanctioned tournament play for the Vintage format will occur year-round. In addition, each local community play group, regardless of their interest in tournament-level play, is free to choose the format that offers them the most enjoyment. And, of course, all miniatures can be used with the 4th Edition Dungeons & Dragons roleplaying game releasing in June 2008.

Q. Does this affect the announced plans to update existing miniatures sets to the new rules?

A. No. Updates to existing miniatures sets will occur as announced. Note that the exact update schedule for earlier sets will be announced shortly.

Q. How does this affect event sanctioning?

A. The Standard/Vintage format distinction will be required on sanctioning and reporting documentation starting in March 2009. The full details on D&D Miniatures Standard and Vintage tournament format rules will be found in the DCI Universal Tournament Rules and D&D Miniatures Floor Rules update on March 14th 2008, effective April 15th 2008. These documents can be found in the DCI Document Center.

Q. What minis are legal in Vintage but not in Standard?

A. Until updated statistics are published online for Sets 11 and earlier, the two formats will have the same list of legal miniatures. Wizards of the Coast will soon announce the publication schedule of updated stats for older sets, at which time we’ll also announce when those sets will enter the Vintage format.

Q. How do you define a block for Standard play?

A. In the Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game, a block is defined as all of the sets that release in the same calendar year. For example, Unhallowed, Night Below, and Desert of Desolation comprise the 2007 block.

Q. When do blocks rotate out of the Standard format?

A. When the first set of a new year’s block is released, the block from two years earlier rotates out of the Standard format. For example, when Set 18 is published in March 2009, the 2007 block (Unhallowed, Night Below, and Desert of Desolation) will rotate out of the Standard format. This rotation keeps the play environment from becoming stagnant and makes it easier for new players to get involved in tournaments.

Q. Will the All-Star set be updated after later sets rotate out of Standard?

A. Yes. We want the All-Star set to reflect an exciting cross-section of older miniatures, and we’ll work with the D&D Miniatures players each year to determine what changes are appropriate for the set

The year: 1994. From out of space comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction! Man's civilization is cast in ruin!
Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn...
A strange new world rises from the old: a world of savagery, super science, and sorcery. But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice! With his companions Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword against the forces of evil.
He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!

Shottglazz
Sergeant
Sergeant
970 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Quinte West, Ontario, Canada

01/24/2008 10:50 AM  
Posted By Wraithborne on 01/24/2008 10:45 AM
Starting on April 15th, 2008, the DCI adds a new format to Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game tournament play.

Q. When do blocks rotate out of the Standard format?

A. When the first set of a new year’s block is released, the block from two years earlier rotates out of the Standard format. For example, when Set 18 is published in March 2009, the 2007 block (Unhallowed, Night Below, and Desert of Desolation) will rotate out of the Standard format. This rotation keeps the play environment from becoming stagnant and makes it easier for new players to get involved in tournaments.



I find this more than a little depressing - it's no secret that I'm not a supporter of 2.0/4.0 but I wasn't expecting them to go the MTG route with sets...if I was considering playing 2.0, this would be the nail in the coffin lid

Shottglazz
"Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand;
I don't care, I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me."

Completed trades ( 48 ): Pikel, Darrell, JeffDHarvey, BiggPappa001, Ghendar, Valinrook X2, Wolfgang x3, Wraithborne x5, Mr Ruffles, Anothermullen, CKissee x3, Browns_Scoundrel, Kyrin, GuJiaXian x2, Tyngfumv, Basic_Aim, Mickey Mouse, Berus316, Crisisman, Zoons, Rockfrd, Sterling40 x2, Brucemc, 2007 Magical Mystery Trade, Redskullz x2, Stephengroy, Lyus_Sleyden, Foolforthought, 2008 Magical Mystery Trade, Kilsek x4, Generic Fighter, Auric, Relientkitten
Pending trades ( 0 ):
WotC trades ( 1 ): Red_Deceiver
Bad trades ( 2 ): LeftEyeofGruumsh, Yotebeth
Knight of the
Round Table

Thenameless
Warlord
Warlord
9044 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

The Fortress of Solitude

01/24/2008 10:55 AM  
Thanks for the complete post Wraithborne. That doesn't sound too bad at the start, but I'm afraid that it seems to have the effect of killing older miniatures as time goes on. If the standard format becomes the premier tournament format, then say goodbye to your older minis.

Over 270 successful online DDM trades.
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 11:01 AM  
I don't get the pessimism. They are supporting Vintage with a Championship from the get go. If you don't like standard, and want to do all Vintage then you just play Vintage. What is the big deal? Personally, I will play both, because of my interest in the larger tournaments. Though I do wonder what will happen to the limited Championship.

I am not gone.

Shottglazz
Sergeant
Sergeant
970 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Quinte West, Ontario, Canada

01/24/2008 11:04 AM  
My pessismism comes from the fact that WotC is doing to DDM exactly what they did with MTG. Only those players who can afford to invest in the newest sets can remain competitive. No matter what your skill, if you can't purchase the newer pieces, you can't compete in Standard Format.


Edited to indicate format.

Shottglazz
"Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand;
I don't care, I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me."

Completed trades ( 48 ): Pikel, Darrell, JeffDHarvey, BiggPappa001, Ghendar, Valinrook X2, Wolfgang x3, Wraithborne x5, Mr Ruffles, Anothermullen, CKissee x3, Browns_Scoundrel, Kyrin, GuJiaXian x2, Tyngfumv, Basic_Aim, Mickey Mouse, Berus316, Crisisman, Zoons, Rockfrd, Sterling40 x2, Brucemc, 2007 Magical Mystery Trade, Redskullz x2, Stephengroy, Lyus_Sleyden, Foolforthought, 2008 Magical Mystery Trade, Kilsek x4, Generic Fighter, Auric, Relientkitten
Pending trades ( 0 ):
WotC trades ( 1 ): Red_Deceiver
Bad trades ( 2 ): LeftEyeofGruumsh, Yotebeth
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 11:05 AM  
Vintage is identical to how DDM was previously. How is this different from how DDM was a year ago or sixth months ago?

I am not gone.

Whatisinaname
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 12:02 PM  

I hope vintage doesnt essentially mean,  have fun at the game shop while the standard means tournament.  That is what it looks like starting next year.   That to me is what really ruins a good game.  Sure alot of people like magic, but how many did they lose along the way.   Now we are gonna get into the realm of having to buy a whole new warband every year.  Boy this really sucks but I could see it coming the minute they announced the new edition.   I just lost the support of my flgs of any ddm2 and any of our local players.  Hopefully I can travel 3+ hours one way to play more than once or twice a year.

Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 12:22 PM  
They said they are having a championship for vintage. That means qualifiers. That means tournaments. It seems that each play group will be able to choose if they want to focus on standard or vintage or both. They are just creating an additional format that newer players can focus on if they want. They are not taking anything away from.

I am not gone.

bshugg
Underboss
Underboss
1821 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 12:23 PM  
I'm actually really happy to see this. They are supporting both formats so thats a wash so far until we see how it works out down the line. Here's the biggest thing it improves:

With out 2 formats:
Old figs will have to be nerfed when reprinted for 4E due to limited availability and the company not making any extra money from them.

With 2 formats:
Old cards can be made stronger as they won't directly impact new sets in every format like they currently do.

This makes all my older figures happy, compared to what I was suspecting was going to happen to most of them. This is a GOOD thing for people with huge collections.

Looking for someone to cosponser a midwest DDM event. let me know if your interested!
Check out my brand new blog:
http://bshugg.blogspot.com

Wraithborne
Commander
Commander
3546 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

West Virginia

01/24/2008 1:33 PM  
Posted By doubtofbuddha on 01/24/2008 11:01 AM
I don't get the pessimism. They are supporting Vintage with a Championship from the get go. If you don't like standard, and want to do all Vintage then you just play Vintage. What is the big deal? Personally, I will play both, because of my interest in the larger tournaments. Though I do wonder what will happen to the limited Championship.

My pessimism comes from two things. First, I think Vintage will end up like Dreamblade, supported at first, but soon ignored.

Second, things coming out of the woodwork like this (we're not redoing any but all-stars, OK we'll do 'em all, Yeah, we're doing 'em all, but they'll only be good for vintage, Insert next whimsical change here) tend to hint that they really don't know what they're doing and are just making it up as they go along. Seeing as how they have been working on 4e since shortly after 3.5 came out and should have known then that they would change the mini game to correspond, you would think that there would've been some sort of plan in place.

The year: 1994. From out of space comes a runaway planet, hurtling between the Earth and the Moon, unleashing cosmic destruction! Man's civilization is cast in ruin!
Two thousand years later, Earth is reborn...
A strange new world rises from the old: a world of savagery, super science, and sorcery. But one man bursts his bonds to fight for justice! With his companions Ookla the Mok and Princess Ariel, he pits his strength, his courage, and his fabulous Sunsword against the forces of evil.
He is Thundarr, the Barbarian!

bshugg
Underboss
Underboss
1821 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/24/2008 1:44 PM  
Posted By Wraithborne on 01/24/2008 1:33 PM

My pessimism comes from two things. First, I think Vintage will end up like Dreamblade, supported at first, but soon ignored.

Second, things coming out of the woodwork like this (we're not redoing any but all-stars, OK we'll do 'em all, Yeah, we're doing 'em all, but they'll only be good for vintage, Insert next whimsical change here) tend to hint that they really don't know what they're doing and are just making it up as they go along. Seeing as how they have been working on 4e since shortly after 3.5 came out and should have known then that they would change the mini game to correspond, you would think that there would've been some sort of plan in place.


Dreamblade bombed because they printed a ton of it, offered a huge amount of cash and didn't even move 10% of the product.   6 months in  half the stores weren't even carrying new sets and the first set was still unsold on their shelves.    I don't think its fair to compare it to Vintage DDM.   Every set up until Bloodwars  sold out the entire print run.  Bloodwars onward may have as well I just don't have confirmation that it did.


There sure are a heck of a lot of changes, but what better time to announce them?  Would you rather have 1 massive change every 3 months or so?  I wouldn't.   Also  the game and organized play are run by different branches of the company.   2.0 minis is an update to improve the game and have it match the new base game.    Vintage/ standard is a change based on organized play's  beliefs on what makes a better game based on tons of feedback.     Again not directly related so its not really fair to tie them together in a pessimistic bundle. To do so seems like trolling.





Looking for someone to cosponser a midwest DDM event. let me know if your interested!
Check out my brand new blog:
http://bshugg.blogspot.com

kritter
Underboss
Underboss
1331 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Calgary, Alberta Canada

01/24/2008 2:53 PM  
Posted By Wraithborne on 01/24/2008 1:33 PM
My pessimism comes from two things. First, I think Vintage will end up like Dreamblade, supported at first, but soon ignored.

Second, things coming out of the woodwork like this (we're not redoing any but all-stars, OK we'll do 'em all, Yeah, we're doing 'em all, but they'll only be good for vintage, Insert next whimsical change here) tend to hint that they really don't know what they're doing and are just making it up as they go along. Seeing as how they have been working on 4e since shortly after 3.5 came out and should have known then that they would change the mini game to correspond, you would think that there would've been some sort of plan in place.

I hate to sound all negative but that's what they say about everything that they phase out with a new edition. i can remember being told that TSR was still going to support my D&D 2nd edition when they release 3.0. well 2 months later no new books, according to the LGS  "there wasn't enough fan base to continue with 2nd edition support" is what he said he got from Wotc/TSR.

i also don't like how they have gone about this whole announcement of 4.0/2.0. The back pedalling answers and the half truths.

they released a schedule but only for the ones that they had already planned to re-release. I wonder how long it's going to be before Harbinger gets updated? 

My prediction:

they will updated there scheduled sets and 2 more and then announce "there isn't enough fan base to bother supporting DDM Vintage" 
followed by,
" please buy some new boosters and play Standard, thanks"  



 


Trades:
Complete: 134
Ongoing: 1
BAD: 2 = Cha0tic g0od, Thor <--- thief and a liar
Champion of the Aspect of Yeenoghu, Demon Prince of Gnolls and Bigby

Sirohk
Commander
Commander
3812 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

USA

01/24/2008 4:00 PM  
Posted By doubtofbuddha on 01/24/2008 11:01 AM
I don't get the pessimism. They are supporting Vintage with a Championship from the get go. If you don't like standard, and want to do all Vintage then you just play Vintage. What is the big deal? Personally, I will play both, because of my interest in the larger tournaments. Though I do wonder what will happen to the limited Championship.

I agree.  I like the idea of TWO Constructed Champioships per year.  I plan to kepp playing is as many events as I can.

Although without winning the airfare it might be difficult for some to make both major events.

And I agree that the Limited Champioship may go the way of the DoDo bird.




Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone
Knight of the Rahshasa's
And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's
Master of the
Awesome Sauce

Teflon Jeff
Warlord
Warlord
7146 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.

01/24/2008 4:31 PM  
all in all, I like it. If they didn't do it, there would just be another reboot in 4-5 years. this si necessary to maintain the growth of the game. Now, they need to support vintage a lot better than they do for Magic.

Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast
Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon
Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon


"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen."

Turboman
Warrior
Warrior
212 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 12:48 AM  
Many players just don't like the idea that they will have miniatures that will become unusable for any specific format. If standard becomes the commonly played format and no one wants to play vintage, the guy that owns vintage miniatures won't be happy. Just the fact that such a thing even could happen is upsetting. If they can support vintage as a format for DDM that'd be great but I doubt that will happen in the long run. The concept failed with Magic, how are they going to make sure it doesn't fail with DDM?


Zyla
Underboss
Underboss
1187 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 12:58 AM  
One of the big things alot of people dont know is how the vintage and legacy formats of MTG actually are.


All MTG card design is only focused on the current block, which is the standard format. When the standard block is rotated out it stays in legacy, where all cards are legal. The problem is there is no design process done to see how the current sets in standard will effect the fcards that already exhist in legacy and vintage. This makes a horribly broken and bad format to play in due to broken comboes and broken cards because no design process was done to try to prevent it. This in turn makes new players not want to play in Vintage or Legacy because of said imbalances between cards, and prefer to play in standard tournaments.


This in term makes venues focus primarily on the standard block format because this is what the new player will usually be playing in, and this in turn forces the legacy player to buy the new set if they want to continue to compete in the majoraty of the tournaments the store holds. And if said vintage player does buy the newest set, there is no longer any reason for the player to play in vintage because he will now be able to play in standard, thus making it even less support.



WoTC can say they will support all formats, but they WONT support a format people dont want to play in.


Dordledum
Commander
Commander
3193 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Netherlands

01/25/2008 4:27 AM  
I join the choir which sings their hope for a successful life of the vintage game. But I'll be playing both probably, because most major tournaments will be standard I fear.

D.

Member of the Bearded Devils
Champion of the Huge Spider (WotDQ 46/60), A New Umber Hulk (DoDe 57/60), and Hardcopy Printed DDM 2.0 Stat-Cards for all Minis!
Knight of Argenis
Corim Danex
Warlord
Warlord
6621 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

West Valley City, Utah

01/25/2008 8:10 AM  
The problem is, there are already enough formats. When you keep adding formats, it gets more difficult to get support (from WotC, stores, and players interested in participating) each one. It hurts the game.

"Look to God and live." Alma 37:47
Vindicated Champ of Hippogriff (Arcadian Hippogriff) and Uncommon Horse

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 2:45 PM  
Posted By Turboman on 01/25/2008 12:48 AM
Many players just don't like the idea that they will have miniatures that will become unusable for any specific format. If standard becomes the commonly played format and no one wants to play vintage, the guy that owns vintage miniatures won't be happy. Just the fact that such a thing even could happen is upsetting. If they can support vintage as a format for DDM that'd be great but I doubt that will happen in the long run. The concept failed with Magic, how are they going to make sure it doesn't fail with DDM?


I'm going to counter WITH a question. What makes you think DDM is like Magic? What also makes you think I'll not support it?

Fact: If you don't play it then yes it'll go away eventually. Why? Because nobody is playing it. If you want it to survive then play it. Have friends play it. I'll play it, even though I can't 'officially' play it.

The support for any format is about player interaction and not my support. I'll give you that support. Support will be there but it requires players. Players asked for it. I've provided it and the success of it is now fully in player's hands.

I'm not normally this frank but I believe you'll appreciate me being so. I can promise nothing as, like I said, it's down to players. I'm convinced this will be as widely successful as any format but even if it lags a bit it'll still get the same support.

So in conclusion this only fails if the community doesn't play it and right now I've too many stores, community members and personal experiences that tell me that we need a more restricted environment to help with newer/introductory play. Unless they and I are all mislead from player feedback. Alternatively enough community members asked for a Vintage format where they can 'consider' using their entire collections even though all my data shows that 90%+ use minis from only the last 3 sets. I've provided this as well.

I read your thoughts with interest and am very happy to dicuss anything anytime.

Ian

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 2:50 PM  
Posted By Corim Danex on 01/25/2008 8:10 AM
The problem is, there are already enough formats. When you keep adding formats, it gets more difficult to get support (from WotC, stores, and players interested in participating) each one. It hurts the game.


I don't agree. I'm in for the long haul the only way anything fails is if the players don't play it. Stores are not stupid and if you say you want to play X or Y they will normally provide it.

I will take the blame for dreaming up formats that players don't want to play. That would be a direct failure of myself and my team but in this instance it was with the help of the community and stores I can to this decision and hence my confidence this is a sound platform for the future. I fully expect to be here in a year's time talking about the success of the format assuming I'm still in the same job *-)

Ian

kritter
Underboss
Underboss
1331 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Calgary, Alberta Canada

01/25/2008 2:52 PM  
My prediction:

they will updated there scheduled sets and 2 more and then announce "there isn't enough fan base to bother supporting DDM Vintage"
followed by,
" please buy some new boosters and play Standard, thanks"


this will be the standard answer and it won't matter how many people are playing it

Trades:
Complete: 134
Ongoing: 1
BAD: 2 = Cha0tic g0od, Thor <--- thief and a liar
Champion of the Aspect of Yeenoghu, Demon Prince of Gnolls and Bigby

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 4:46 PM  
Posted By kritter on 01/25/2008 2:52 PM
My prediction:

they will updated there scheduled sets and 2 more and then announce "there isn't enough fan base to bother supporting DDM Vintage"
followed by,
" please buy some new boosters and play Standard, thanks"


this will be the standard answer and it won't matter how many people are playing it


They? I suggest reading what I wrote above as I think this answers and dispells your prediction.

Ian

Ian Richards
Program Manager for DDM
Organized Play
Wizards of the Coast

Zyla
Underboss
Underboss
1187 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 10:07 PM  
But what about my question on designing figures to work with both formats? Will figures be designed with Vintage in mind or is the Vintage format doomed to have 80 pages of errata and a ban list a mile long like Legacy MTG has?

Knight of the
Round Table

Thenameless
Warlord
Warlord
9044 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

The Fortress of Solitude

01/25/2008 10:39 PM  
Posted By doubtofbuddha on 01/24/2008 11:01 AM
I don't get the pessimism. They are supporting Vintage with a Championship from the get go. If you don't like standard, and want to do all Vintage then you just play Vintage. What is the big deal? Personally, I will play both, because of my interest in the larger tournaments. Though I do wonder what will happen to the limited Championship.


Pessimism is a bit strong of a word.  As I said, I am generally an optimist.  But, the fact that there are two formats being introduced, with the one not including the older minis being the one called Standard, makes one wonder if there are in fact bad intentions for older minis in the future.

Here's our roller-coaster ride.  Long, long ago, I read on the WotC boards that Ian Richards himself didn't want to go to set rotation for DDM.  Then 2.0 comes out, with only 60 All-Stars to be carried forward.  Huge uproar from fans of older minis.  Wizards decides that all older minis will be updated to 2.0.  Yay!  Now, they introduce two formats, and the one called Standard does not include older minis.  Why?

Over 270 successful online DDM trades.

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/25/2008 10:41 PM  
Posted By Zyla on 01/25/2008 10:07 PM
But what about my question on designing figures to work with both formats? Will figures be designed with Vintage in mind or is the Vintage format doomed to have 80 pages of errata and a ban list a mile long like Legacy MTG has?

There is no plan to develop figures that are NOT compatable with both formats. In all this time we only had one miniature we considered we needed to remove from any format and hopefully that won't need to happen again.

Again do not compare DDM and Magic... that's like comparing Apples and Bananas. They aren't the same color or shape.

Ian

Krush
Commander
Commander
3143 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/26/2008 1:07 AM  
Posted By Thenameless on 01/25/2008 10:39 PM

Here's our roller-coaster ride.  Long, long ago, I read on the WotC boards that Ian Richards himself didn't want to go to set rotation for DDM.  Then 2.0 comes out, with only 60 All-Stars to be carried forward.  Huge uproar from fans of older minis.  Wizards decides that all older minis will be updated to 2.0.  Yay!  Now, they introduce two formats, and the one called Standard does not include older minis.  Why?

This whole Standard vs Vintage is giving me a big headache.  I can't understand why they are doing it. My income is limited as I have three kids, 2 of which are teenagers. Now you know where the money goes. To play Standard, if I am reading into this right, it'll only include the newer 3 plus future sets. I don't have the spare $$ to spend on 2-3 cases like others. That being said, they are more than capable to field a capable 2.0 warband at any time. I myself, cannot and therefore will consider, when going to league play and when not to, depending on the format.
As for the set rotation..."the nameless" noted, fans were excited that all older minis would be upgraded to 2.0.  Not to be, thanks to set rotation and I think that Wizards has pulled a dangle dangle yank on us and I, myself don't F******G like it.

My spew,

K 2.1

Gehenna

Vrecknidj
Warlord
Warlord
10301 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

United States

01/26/2008 6:03 AM  
I was going to jump in and thank Jesse and Brad for their posts. I happen to agree with them. The way the vintage play has been set up, this pretty much looks like a direct confirmation to all the negativity after GenCon last year.

There was this huge almost retaliatory backlash against the announcement that the game was going to change and that most of the old pieces would no longer be playable.

Then, time passed, and WotC turned their ship around a bit and agreed to restat pieces other than just the All Stars. This was seen by many players a huge victory on their part. It seemed to be a demonstration that a vocal minority of purchasers could persuade the juggernaut to cater to them.

But, if you think about it, the championship format that isn't vintage is really just WotC's way of compromise. They're keeping the format they offered to us at last year's GenCon, and also keeping the format so many skirmishers cried out for (i.e. the vintage).

Thank you so much for reading and posting here Ian. It brightens my day that you are still giving the Maxminis boards serious consideration. I know how many of the tournament players have made Hordelings their permanent home. But a good chunk of players still like to use both sites, and it's nice to see you posting here.

I don't have enormous amounts of disposable income either (like Krush, I have two teenagers, I don't know about the rest of his situation, but my wife is a stay-at-home mom and I work 2 or 3 jobs to support the family). But, I don't see my minis purchasing habits changing any. I have enough pieces to play vintage. I haven't bought a case since Blood War, but I manage to accumulate enough pieces, through playing Limited and buying from 3rd party sellers, to have access to the warbands that seem reasonable to me. There are only so many bands that will be viable in Standard play in any given season, and all those pieces are going to be the ones I've been recently buying anyway, so I don't see the problem, really.

I'm throwing my hat into the "I like the Standard and Vintage" camp.

Dave

Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing;
My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right!

Sirohk
Commander
Commander
3812 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

USA

01/26/2008 7:05 AM  
Posted By Wraithborne on 01/24/2008 10:45 AM Starting on April 15th, 2008, the DCI adds a new format to Dungeons & Dragons Miniatures Game tournament play. Standard Rotation Schedule for 2008 April 15: Standard format debuts with Unhallowed, Desert of Desolation, and Dungeons of Dread. June 1: Night Below rotates into Standard (using updated stats published online in May). July 4: Against the Giants rotates into Standard. August 1: All-Star set rotates into Standard (using updated stats published online in July). November 7: Demonweb rotates into Standard. Some Frequently Asked Questions: Q. When do blocks rotate out of the Standard format? A. When the first set of a new year’s block is released, the block from two years earlier rotates out of the Standard format. For example, when Set 18 is published in March 2009, the 2007 block (Unhallowed, Night Below, and Desert of Desolation) will rotate out of the Standard format. This rotation keeps the play environment from becoming stagnant and makes it easier for new players to get involved in tournaments. Q. Will the All-Star set be updated after later sets rotate out of Standard? A. Yes. We want the All-Star set to reflect an exciting cross-section of older miniatures, and we’ll work with the D&D Miniatures players each year to determine what changes are appropriate for the set.


It says August 1st All-Stars rotate into Standard (and thus will be available for 2008 Standard Championship at GenCon (and not much time to test before GenCon)).

This seems to mean that there will always be an All Stars set in the Standard format.  It just will be "adjusted" from time to time based on the last answer.  This seems ok and I like it.

Furthermore this seems to mean to me that as older sets are rotated out, the All Star set could get updated to bring rotated out fan favorite figures back up into the Standard format.  Again sounds good to me.

On the other hand, if the All Stars gain figures this way, then some older figures must be getting rotated out of the All Stars.   I can see 2-3 years down the road the All Stars being only from the middle rotated out sets and none of the very older minis (from the first 11 sets) not being in the All Stars.

Or conversely, WotC could make the All Stars to be more than 60.  Or have 2 All Star sets. Or....

My head is starting to hurt thinking about all of the possiblities.

Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone
Knight of the Rahshasa's
And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/26/2008 10:52 AM  
Posted By Krush on 01/26/2008 1:07 AM
Posted By Thenameless on 01/25/2008 10:39 PM

Here's our roller-coaster ride.  Long, long ago, I read on the WotC boards that Ian Richards himself didn't want to go to set rotation for DDM.  Then 2.0 comes out, with only 60 All-Stars to be carried forward.  Huge uproar from fans of older minis.  Wizards decides that all older minis will be updated to 2.0.  Yay!  Now, they introduce two formats, and the one called Standard does not include older minis.  Why?

This whole Standard vs Vintage is giving me a big headache.  I can't understand why they are doing it. My income is limited as I have three kids, 2 of which are teenagers. Now you know where the money goes. To play Standard, if I am reading into this right, it'll only include the newer 3 plus future sets. I don't have the spare $$ to spend on 2-3 cases like others. That being said, they are more than capable to field a capable 2.0 warband at any time. I myself, cannot and therefore will consider, when going to league play and when not to, depending on the format.
As for the set rotation..."the nameless" noted, fans were excited that all older minis would be upgraded to 2.0.  Not to be, thanks to set rotation and I think that Wizards has pulled a dangle dangle yank on us and I, myself don't F******G like it.

My spew,

K 2.1


As to why. I'll outline it again. Because after long long consultation with newer players, stores and existing community players offering a second format that they wanted seemed appropriate. See the posts on our boards.
As to me saying I don't want it. No I don't want anything that players, as a whole, dont want. It's irrelivant what I personally want as this is all about what the community as a whole wants. You guys can't and shouldn't be forced to play what I personally want. Example: I hate the idea of slot zeros for D&D as I used to almost exclusively DM and never thought playing an adventure aided my understanding over reading it through several times and making copious notes. But RPGA members do and so it happens.
Krush: I personally think this format will help you. If you only have limited spend then the percentage of viable minis you get in a few boosters will likely be higher in a limited format than a 'play them all' format. I have no idea of you collection size but if it's extensive and you trade well then the Vintage format maybe a competitive outlet. I've tried to offer a format and tournament support identical for both sets of players. Those that want to play with everything and those saying they want a more restricted environment. Therefore we've removed nothing and added something to aid those players asking for it. You can still play competitively as you did if playing with everything was the most desired format. Still play in a championship series and still win prizes the same.

Ian

Shottglazz
Sergeant
Sergeant
970 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Quinte West, Ontario, Canada

01/26/2008 2:46 PM  
Ian, I would also like to thank you for posting your comments. With all the negativity in this thread (mine included), it takes a lot to state calmly and clearly why your division made the choices it did. I'd like to think that regardless of what we think of those choices, we can all respect you for doing so.

Shottglazz
"Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand;
I don't care, I'm still free, you can't take the sky from me."

Completed trades ( 48 ): Pikel, Darrell, JeffDHarvey, BiggPappa001, Ghendar, Valinrook X2, Wolfgang x3, Wraithborne x5, Mr Ruffles, Anothermullen, CKissee x3, Browns_Scoundrel, Kyrin, GuJiaXian x2, Tyngfumv, Basic_Aim, Mickey Mouse, Berus316, Crisisman, Zoons, Rockfrd, Sterling40 x2, Brucemc, 2007 Magical Mystery Trade, Redskullz x2, Stephengroy, Lyus_Sleyden, Foolforthought, 2008 Magical Mystery Trade, Kilsek x4, Generic Fighter, Auric, Relientkitten
Pending trades ( 0 ):
WotC trades ( 1 ): Red_Deceiver
Bad trades ( 2 ): LeftEyeofGruumsh, Yotebeth

WotC_Ian
Skirmisher
Skirmisher
25 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


01/26/2008 5:51 PM  
Posted By Shottglazz on 01/26/2008 2:46 PM
Ian, I would also like to thank you for posting your comments. With all the negativity in this thread (mine included), it takes a lot to state calmly and clearly why your division made the choices it did. I'd like to think that regardless of what we think of those choices, we can all respect you for doing so.


In that vain let's discuss people's concerns and dislikes. I thought I'd pretty much accounted for the community's feedback but I'm certainly happy to see what I can do further.

Ian
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 41234 > >>




ActiveForums 3.7
Play Dreamblade Now!
You must be signed in to participate in the games.
Copyright 2003-2008 by maxminis.com   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement