Can of the Cave Beer Commander
 2838 Posts




 | | 03/11/2006 7:26 PM |
| I haven't seen anyone else mention this so I thought I'd bring it up.
When I looked at my profile, I noticed that I had 61/60 of Underdark. After examining the H/W section, I noticed that the Dolgaunt Monk was listed twice.
I've tried blanking out (or using zeros) for the values of one of the Dolgaunts, but the value keeps returning--meaning that I have an "incomplete" set with 61/60 miniatures.
It's not a huge deal, but I worry that it might be the symptom of a larger issue. | | Champion of the Werewolf Lord, Knight of Anything Duergar, and Squire of Things Gnollish List reset with the start of previews for each new set...got Chainmail®? | |
|
Sacred Lye Warrior
 184 Posts




 | | 03/12/2006 9:54 AM |
| I am having the Same issue with The azer raider from Harbinger. It is doubling up as well. Nothing I try can fix it. I got everything backed up, so you can wipe out my list If that will fix it.
Sacred
| | My Trade/Reference List is Here | |
|
The Mighty jai Commander
 3235 Posts



 | | 03/12/2006 3:55 PM |
| | Those duplicate records should be deleted. You will need to re-enter those numbers. Turns out there were some 20 duplicate records. | | | |
|
 Lab Monkey Commander
 4135 Posts




 | | 03/12/2006 5:12 PM |
| | I'm currently getting 74/72 on Giants of Legend. | | Have: Cat; Want: Storm Giant Champion of Anything Dragonlance Before trading, please check the Disputed Trades Thread | |
|
Sacred Lye Warrior
 184 Posts




 | | 03/12/2006 8:22 PM |
| quote: Originally posted by jai
Those duplicate records should be deleted. You will need to re-enter those numbers. Turns out there were some 20 duplicate records.
Thanks, that fixed it!!
Sacred | | My Trade/Reference List is Here | |
|
The Mighty jai Commander
 3235 Posts



 | | 03/12/2006 8:43 PM |
| quote: Originally posted by Lab Monkey
I'm currently getting 74/72 on Giants of Legend.
You should be fixed up.
If this keeps happening i am doing to start doubting the integrity of our DB ... | | | |
|
Kithmaker Commander
 3926 Posts




 | | 03/13/2006 12:04 AM |
| I realize it's not directly related, but it's kind of weird to see something like "Aspect of Lolth" come up twice since it's listed under that exact name for both the miniature and the epic card. Any way to modify the entry so the card includes the word "card?"
| | My H/W list is not current... Trade Reference List OLD Trade references (191) | |
|
The Mighty jai Commander
 3235 Posts



 | | 03/13/2006 10:33 AM |
| quote: Originally posted by Kithmaker
I realize it's not directly related, but it's kind of weird to see something like "Aspect of Lolth" come up twice since it's listed under that exact name for both the miniature and the epic card. Any way to modify the entry so the card includes the word "card?"
How are you getting them both to come up together on the same list? | | | |
|
 Lab Monkey Commander
 4135 Posts




 | | 03/13/2006 3:23 PM |
| quote: Originally posted by jai
quote: Originally posted by Lab Monkey
I'm currently getting 74/72 on Giants of Legend.
You should be fixed up.
If this keeps happening i am doing to start doubting the integrity of our DB ...
It is fixed. Many thanks. | | Have: Cat; Want: Storm Giant Champion of Anything Dragonlance Before trading, please check the Disputed Trades Thread | |
|
 Lead Moderator LCS Underboss
 1867 Posts




 | | 03/13/2006 4:34 PM |
| quote: Originally posted by jai
quote: Originally posted by Kithmaker
I realize it's not directly related, but it's kind of weird to see something like "Aspect of Lolth" come up twice since it's listed under that exact name for both the miniature and the epic card. Any way to modify the entry so the card includes the word "card?"
How are you getting them both to come up together on the same list?
He's probably referring to the "Trader has" / "Trader wants" menus in the trade search interface.
| | | |
|
Kithmaker Commander
 3926 Posts




 | |
The Mighty jai Commander
 3235 Posts



 | | 03/13/2006 10:52 PM |
| Oh yeah, that. [)] Can you guys suffer a bit longer, i am pondering some options. | | | |
|