Search
Thursday, August 21, 2008..:: Forums::..Register  Login
Subject: Qualifiers: Lessons Learned

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123
AuthorMessages

Tried
Sergeant
Sergeant
496 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 2:22 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by greyhaze

Maybe this can help put some perspective on how it supposed to work... One attempt (unless you go to the grinder as well), that's it.



Dude, I have totally looked throught the DCI rules and couldn't find an example of this. [:)]
(Funny, because pre-releases ARE on the same day, or within one day of each other - and there are often MORE of them than quals. How do they do that?)

Is there any - you know - *evidence* to suggest that this is actually the intent of WoTC? [)]

Because, to me, the fact that they CAN do things on one day, but choose not to (and that they have specifically stated that you CAN go to more than one qual), seems pretty indicative to me of their intent. [)]

I would also point out that this is as close to a premier tournament series as WoTC has for DDM right now. Hopefully that changes in the future.

Because I DO understand where you are coming from, and I could see such changes being instituted in the future.

(But hopefully not until after next year. I would totally like to play with the Toronto guys....)


Let it be.
D&D Miniatures
Guru

guyf
Sergeant
Sergeant
545 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 2:31 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by greyhaze

All of the qualifiers are supposed to happen simultaneously

Says who? It's possible that someone from WotC said this, but I don't remember seeing that info anywhere.

quote:
That is how a tournament is supposed to work. Look at the olympics. You get one shot at the cup, that's it. It IS unsportsmanlike to go to another qualifier, there's nothing set up against it, so people do it.

Clearly, the olympic format is one way to run a championship. Clearly, it is not the *only* way to run a championship. Nor is it necessarily the *best* way to run a championship.

Interestingly, olympic qualifiers are not all held at the same time. For many olympic sports, each nation holds their own qualifiers, and these happen at different times. The only reason an olympic athelete can attend just one of these qualifiers is because the olympics are implicitly a region-vs-region sort of thing. (And this doesn't even account for those nations where there are no qualifiers for a given sport. The representative atheletes are selected via some other mechanism.) The DDM championship is not a region-vs-region sort of thing. If it were, players would be expressly forbidden from being allowed to qualify outside of their region.

-
Guy Fullerton
Official D&D Miniatures Net Rep

robbdaman
Underboss
Underboss
2380 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 3:27 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Fenris

quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman


Sorry that some people don't play competitively enough to make the you happy. We have a fun time when we play. We're not hardcore, anal players like some people. Paying $10 to get ripped apart by someone from another state doesn't constitute fun to some people. If it does for you, more power to you. Meeting players from other places can be fun but you're assuming that everyone finds it so.

My perspective is that this qualifier season has only shown me that there are some people with way too much time and money to be able to travel all over for a game. I did that for Magic tourneys when I was in my early 20's. Now that I'm older I find better things to do with my time and money.

R~



quote:
Originally posted by Aesop


One hot summer’s day a Fox was strolling through an orchard till he came to a bunch of Grapes just ripening on a vine which had been trained over a lofty branch. “Just the things to quench my thirst,” quoth he. Drawing back a few paces, he took a run and a jump, and just missed the bunch. Turning round again with a One, Two, Three, he jumped up, but with no greater success. Again and again he tried after the tempting morsel, but at last had to give it up, and walked away with his nose in the air, saying: “I am sure they are sour.”



You can't have it both ways. If you're not competitive, then why does it bother you to be "ripped apart" by someone from out of state? After all, you're playing for the fun of playing, not to win right? Or maybe winning does matter to you, which is a pretty good definition of "competitive" in my book.

Also, you traveled around for Magic tournaments, but because you did it at a (presumably) younger age than others, you're somehow better than people who do it at an older age? Want to explain that logic?

Not to mention, qualifiers are feeder tournaments for nationals, which in case you haven't noticed, takes place in Indianapolis -- requiring travel for most people. So your casual local players can't possibly compete in nationals without traveling, but you're looking down on people who travel to your local qualifier tournament? There's a disconnect here, and your air of superiority about it is misplaced and annoying.

I'll echo (and elaborate on) what Dagni said: Qualifiers aren't meant to be won by casual players. Qualifiers exclude people by design -- only four people get invites to nationals at each qualifier, everybody else is not invited (aka, excluded).

And what's the point of nationals, anyway? Is it a tournament where any casual player can show up with a Human Cleric of Bane warband and have a shot at winning? No, it's a highly competitive, relatively exclusive tournament where to do well you need to bring a highly efficient band with which you have practiced heavily. If that kind of tournament doesn't interest you, why are you worried about who wins a feeder tournament for it?



Your entire argument holds no air with me at all. Simply because people can travel doesn't mean they should be allowed to qualify at several tournaments. If you've qualified do the right thing and stay home. It'd almost be best if WotC didn't give a plane ticket so people wouldn't want to travel all over. There wouldn't be the incentive to do that type of thing which I too consider unsportsmanlike. Or if they gave less qualifying spots per tournament and had more tournaments. This was how it was done with Magic back in the day. As for why we travelled to Magic qualifiers, they didn't give us any in our town. That is why we travelled. Either way supposed big wigs blow all the fire out a local scene when they "invade" as people have put it. It's just that simple. While there are some competitive players not everyone is, and even some of the competitive players didn't want to play because they felt their chances were lessened. I don't chastise the players who came so much as I do WotC for not providing the qualifiers to make the chances more reasonable. This qualifier season has been all about being in the right place at the right time or just living near a weak qualifier location for some. It'd be nice to face a pathetically weak field of 11 only halfway competitive players and have an easy chance at a qualifier win. Then we have places that are 4-5 times as many players where obviously any competitive player needs some luck to get by. It's a very flawed setup and makes even me not want to play in qualifiers because of it. Now if WotC used their brains and didn't place some qualifiers in really stupid places I'd be less annoyed in general at the shape of things. Sadly they didn't do a good job of placing qualifier locations so we end up with easy wins for some and hard ones for others. Oh and don't be so arrogant about who you are and your opinions on the subject. Your sarcasm comes off really uppity.

R~

Champion of the Titan
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
Successful trades with: Tickparasite, Iyceman, Faragdar The Wise's friend, avrivah, Drakkengi, brucemc, Krush, maniacal_mini_monger, hung4treason, Gandy, NarlethDrider, Kunimatyu, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.....

Zoons
Underboss
Underboss
1054 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 3:37 PM  
I'd like to see DDM try the olympic theme too. Partition the country/world into specific regions and use the different formats as different events and hold regional tournaments. It'd be cool.

Or 5 man teams with four of the players tied to a faction and the other getting choice. 5 rounds of round robin play and the region with the most wins is the overall champ.

Just an idea. I'd like more tournaments and I really like Team concepts.

Never teach a pig to sing. It's a waste of time and it annoys the pig.

Champion of the Blink Dog.

sienar
Sergeant
Sergeant
636 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 3:55 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Zoons

I'd like to see DDM try the olympic theme too. Partition the country/world into specific regions and use the different formats as different events and hold regional tournaments. It'd be cool.

Or 5 man teams with four of the players tied to a faction and the other getting choice. 5 rounds of round robin play and the region with the most wins is the overall champ.

Just an idea. I'd like more tournaments and I really like Team concepts.



I would *love* a team championship in addition to the normal one. I may be swayed by the fact that I was attempting to put an informal one together not too long ago. [:D] I haven't forgotten about it. Maybe I'll try again after the championships.

[http://www.hordelings.com/frontend/profiles/profile.php?user_id=22]

Gnolaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
854 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:00 PM  
Enter a vote for no change needed.

I see no reason why I should not be allowed to play in as many qualifiers as I want.

Sure I'd be nice and pass down the invite if I could. But when you get right down to it, invites are earned. I've never 'let' anyone (even a child) beat me at anything. You want to win, earn it. It is more satisfying for all concerned that way.

We have this game to play, I mean thats the reasons why we have events, and ID=0. All of a sudden you want to tell me I can't?

My online store http://store.hoardsters.com
Use quick search to see scans of every stat card!

Felagund
Sergeant
Sergeant
922 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:10 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman

Oh and don't be so arrogant about who you are and your opinions on the subject. Your sarcasm comes off really uppity.
I didn't see anything in Fenris' post that came across as arrogant or uppity. Furthermore, I've had the pleasure of meeting him in person, and I can say he is definitely one of the friendliest and most courteous players in the game.

He made a valid point. Either you want to play competitively, or you don't. But if you want to play competitively, don't complain when you get beat out by better players. If someone really wants to make it to the Championships, they should improve their game. Not try to gerrymander their way in.

I think invites should pass down, but that anybody who hasn't already won a qualifier should be allowed to play. Why punish the people who love the game the most? The folks that are traveling to compete in multiple qualifiers are doing far more to promote the game than those who won't even drop $10 to play in their hometown for fear of out-of-towners.

I think this topic started off with good intentions, but it seems to me like it's been reduced to bitterness from those who failed to qualify.

Champion of Gnomes

Gnolaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
854 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:24 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Felagund
I think this topic started off with good intentions, but it seems to me like it's been reduced to bitterness from those who failed to qualify.



QFT

My online store http://store.hoardsters.com
Use quick search to see scans of every stat card!

Tried
Sergeant
Sergeant
496 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:30 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman
Your entire argument holds no air with me at all. Simply because people can travel doesn't mean they should be allowed to qualify at several tournaments..... ....supposed big wigs blow all the fire out a local scene when they "invade" as people have put it. ... This qualifier season has been all about being in the right place at the right time or just living near a weak qualifier location ... It'd be nice to face a pathetically weak field of 11 only halfway competitive players .... It's a very flawed ...qualifiers in really stupid places ....and don't be so arrogant about who you are and your opinions on the subject...


Wow. So many ridiculous comments, so little time.
Fenris gets a free invite, btw, and hasn't competed in any quals.
And, IMO, both he and kiddoc have earned the right to be arrogant. A little, anyway.
When you've done the same, I'll give you the same slack.

Did you ever consider that quals are placed where they are to allow travel? Why do you think edmonton gets a qual, and vancouver not? Because seattle is close to vancouver. Similarly, socal did not get a qual because both phoenix and san francisco are within traveling distance. (Even SLC can be done.) The quals are distributed to allow players that wish to be competitive to get to a qual.

IF you want a regional championship, organize one. We did. New England did. the Midwest did. Montreal did.
Then, you can be the biggest fish in the pond.
But don't think that WoTC made a qualifier just for you and your local clique of buddies. (Talk about arrogant).

Only one player who had qualified at a previous event came to AZ, and he won first place, justifying the reason a pre-qual'ed player should be allowed to continue playing.

And a championship, to my understanding, is supposed to be composed of the best of the best. As an example, from SoCal alone, we placed 1,3,4,5, 9th and 17th last year. Is it right that we have to share 4 qualifying spots with Norcal? Meh, maybe. But we have the option to go elsewhere and qualify. Like AZ, (where 2 of us qual'ed last year) or other places.









Let it be.

doranur
Warrior
Warrior
180 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:41 PM  
i've been avoiding this thread in general, but for those of you stepping into the discussion late, it's been going on all qualifier season.

here's the references, go ahead, read all of em before ya post, it's long, it's boring, and it will keep the same old arguments from being rehashed (not really, but maybe just slower)

"So Many Deserving Players, So Few Qualifying Spots" http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=21203

"Dropping out of a tournament?" http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=20720

"Secrets & Cliques" http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=20144

The last couple pages of "Event: UTAH - NATIONAL QUALIFIER, Constructed May 6" http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=18261&whichpage=1

"Competitive VS Casual" http://www.maxminis.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=21507

to be perfectly honest, at this point i no longer see any reasons to continue this discussion unless people will only make constructive suggestions. people are too emotional over this subject to have rational discourse (not all people, but enough to make every thread on this descend into a pit of snakes).

now if ya want to keep posting, get reading.

-Doranur

join the revolution! down with round/turn fascism! viva la resistance!

Kithmaker
Commander
Commander
3926 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 4:55 PM  
Yeah, this is my thread, and even I think it's run its course.

My H/W list is not current...
Trade Reference List
OLD Trade references (191)

robbdaman
Underboss
Underboss
2380 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 5:47 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Tried

quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman
Your entire argument holds no air with me at all. Simply because people can travel doesn't mean they should be allowed to qualify at several tournaments..... ....supposed big wigs blow all the fire out a local scene when they "invade" as people have put it. ... This qualifier season has been all about being in the right place at the right time or just living near a weak qualifier location ... It'd be nice to face a pathetically weak field of 11 only halfway competitive players .... It's a very flawed ...qualifiers in really stupid places ....and don't be so arrogant about who you are and your opinions on the subject...


Wow. So many ridiculous comments, so little time.
Fenris gets a free invite, btw, and hasn't competed in any quals.
And, IMO, both he and kiddoc have earned the right to be arrogant. A little, anyway.
When you've done the same, I'll give you the same slack.

Did you ever consider that quals are placed where they are to allow travel? Why do you think edmonton gets a qual, and vancouver not? Because seattle is close to vancouver. Similarly, socal did not get a qual because both phoenix and san francisco are within traveling distance. (Even SLC can be done.) The quals are distributed to allow players that wish to be competitive to get to a qual.

IF you want a regional championship, organize one. We did. New England did. the Midwest did. Montreal did.
Then, you can be the biggest fish in the pond.
But don't think that WoTC made a qualifier just for you and your local clique of buddies. (Talk about arrogant).

Only one player who had qualified at a previous event came to AZ, and he won first place, justifying the reason a pre-qual'ed player should be allowed to continue playing.

And a championship, to my understanding, is supposed to be composed of the best of the best. As an example, from SoCal alone, we placed 1,3,4,5, 9th and 17th last year. Is it right that we have to share 4 qualifying spots with Norcal? Meh, maybe. But we have the option to go elsewhere and qualify. Like AZ, (where 2 of us qual'ed last year) or other places.





First off you guys seem to be taking this personally and it's not a personal thing. I never named names nor did I direct my comments as being toward any individual. Yet you're just as sarcastic with your comments as Fenris was. Like I said but you didn't quote I don't chastise the players but apparently you're taking my comments as being directed toward you. Meanwhile I've been directing my opinions about the concept of qualifiers as a whole and not at any one person or their opinions. Do the same and you might not sound so damn arrogant and rude to me. So take that for what it's worth to you.

But since we're directing things you did qualify here in AZ and that didn't stop you from moving on to the CO qualifier to try to get a plane ticket elsewhere. Granted you were playing a totally off the wall Dragonne warband so you might have not been taking it too seriously. And yes Dagni did the same thing by qualifying in UT and then coming to AZ though he obviously took it much more seriously because he wanted the plane ticket. Like I said take away the plane tickets for the qualifiers and even out the field a bit. I'd be perfectly happy if they took away the plane tickets for the qualifiers and gave them to the top 20-25 DCI players so they didn't have to work for it. That way those players listed in the top 20 or so can actually be there. Like the guys from Columbia, Costa Rica or Australia who might not be able to make it otherwise even if invited. Then it'd actually be a World Championship instead of a North American Championship with a few guys from Europe. You're right lots of people have earned it and I'd be fine if they were given a freebie just for busting their asses and winning so much.

As far as the qualifier layout I think it's lousy. You can't convince me otherwise simply because I believe it was poorly organized and that's how I feel. To me there are locations that are obviously far too easy and others that are obviously effectively a small grinder. So I think the layout is horrid as a result of that fact. End of story.

R~

Champion of the Titan
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
Successful trades with: Tickparasite, Iyceman, Faragdar The Wise's friend, avrivah, Drakkengi, brucemc, Krush, maniacal_mini_monger, hung4treason, Gandy, NarlethDrider, Kunimatyu, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.....

Gnolaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
854 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 5:53 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman

I'd be perfectly happy if they took away the plane tickets for the qualifiers and gave them to the top 20-25 DCI players so they didn't have to work for it.


You know one of the best ways to raise your rating? Play in qualifiers. You suggestiong would likely result in a great increase in what you are, I feel misquidedly, trying to decrease.

quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman
As far as the qualifier layout I think it's lousy. You can't convince me otherwise simply because I believe it was poorly organized and that's how I feel. To me there are locations that are obviously far too easy and others that are obviously effectively a small grinder. So I think the layout is horrid as a result of that fact. End of story.


Fine, you feel it is lousy. Supply a better one.

My online store http://store.hoardsters.com
Use quick search to see scans of every stat card!

robbdaman
Underboss
Underboss
2380 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 6:02 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Gnolaum

quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman

I'd be perfectly happy if they took away the plane tickets for the qualifiers and gave them to the top 20-25 DCI players so they didn't have to work for it.


You know one of the best ways to raise your rating? Play in qualifiers. You suggestiong would likely result in a great increase in what you are, I feel misquidedly, trying to decrease.

quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman
As far as the qualifier layout I think it's lousy. You can't convince me otherwise simply because I believe it was poorly organized and that's how I feel. To me there are locations that are obviously far too easy and others that are obviously effectively a small grinder. So I think the layout is horrid as a result of that fact. End of story.


Fine, you feel it is lousy. Supply a better one.




Heh, well playing in the qualifier definately did not raise my rating. Raising my rating would take a solid competitive scene and as I stated we really don't have one despite having some solid competitive level players. As for supplying a better layout I don't work for WotC so it wouldn't matter if I did come up with one. All I can do is voice my complaints and hope they change things.

R~

Champion of the Titan
******************************************************************************************************************************************************
Successful trades with: Tickparasite, Iyceman, Faragdar The Wise's friend, avrivah, Drakkengi, brucemc, Krush, maniacal_mini_monger, hung4treason, Gandy, NarlethDrider, Kunimatyu, etc, etc, blah, blah, blah.....

Gnolaum
Sergeant
Sergeant
854 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 6:22 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman
Heh, well playing in the qualifier definately did not raise my rating. Raising my rating would take a solid competitive scene and as I stated we really don't have one despite having some solid competitive level players. As for supplying a better layout I don't work for WotC so it wouldn't matter if I did come up with one. All I can do is voice my complaints and hope they change things.


Oh, I'm sorry. I tried rewriting and rewriting what I was going to say regarding qualifiers and ratings, but I couldn't do it without sounding snide, and that isn't my intent.

The reason why I challenged you to come up with one, is that I feel it is impossible to create a reasonable system in which each qualifier is of relatively of equal difficulty to qualify.

My online store http://store.hoardsters.com
Use quick search to see scans of every stat card!
D&D Miniatures
Guru

guyf
Sergeant
Sergeant
545 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 6:47 PM  
Though I've chimed in on this thread a couple times, I've tried to stay pretty neutral regarding the validity of negative feelings and the qualification format. However, I think it might be valuable for me to chime in on the subject:

Negative reactions to a tournament format are a legitimate concern for the whole community.

I believe most of us want the DDM player base to grow.

However, if some portion of the player base experiences a "neg" (a negative reaction) at a DDM tournament, they might stop playing altogether. If this neg shrinks the player base, we all suffer.

I think bshugg explained the ideal goal: Let's grow the game and get new/casual players into the tournament scene *without* causing negs. I have one or two ideas on how to do this. Some have been executed as part of the California Open series. (Think: A secondary event run in parallel with the main event.)

So, while it is 100% reasonable, acceptable, and useful for a player to travel to multiple qualifiers, even if they already qualified, it's also 100% reasonable, acceptable, and useful for some other player to say that such things turn them off of the game.

It's *not* reasonable for a player to say that folks shouldn't be allowed to travel to multiple qualifiers. If that were reasonable, the qualifier rules would contain that restriction. According to the qualifier rules, competitive players are entitled to multiple chances to compete.

It's also *not* reasonable for a competitive player to say some other player's feelings regarding the qualifier aren't relevant. Competitive players *need* many other sorts of players (and roleplayers) to be happy with the product, otherwise there won't be a product at all. Players are entitled to share their negs so that WotC and the community can figure out what the needs are.

...not sure if this is really helping the situation, but there you go.

-
Guy Fullerton
Official D&D Miniatures Net Rep

Gristlemane
Sergeant
Sergeant
623 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 7:20 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by kyrin

That's kinda sad, IMNSHO. Dude didn't seem to be having a lot of fun while playing me, and I'm not sure how much attention he was even paying to my moves. He was just waiting to execute the next standard move for his standard band.

...

Interesting language, too. When someone plays a "non-Tier I" band, it's called a "rogue" band. I would use the word "original."


In Magic parlance, this is the difference between Spike and Johnny players. Spikes will play a deck they got off the internet, and their only concern is beating you. Johnnies have more fun building interesting decks/warbands than piloting someone else's stuff to victory.

Personally I don't have any problem with people using a top tier warband at a qualifier. Casual games should be casual play and tournaments are meant for competitive play.

It's deja vu all over again.

Tried
Sergeant
Sergeant
496 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 7:25 PM  
"First off you guys seem to be taking this personally and it's not a personal thing."

Hmmmm. Seemed personal to me, even when we weren't naming names either.

"Meanwhile I've been directing my opinions about the concept of qualifiers as a whole and not at any one person or their opinions. Do the same and you might not sound so damn arrogant and rude to me."


I'm not being intentionally rude, I'm not the only one coming across that way (cough), and i am simply the voice on the other side of the argument. The one you decided was wrong.


But since we're directing things you did qualify here in AZ and that didn't stop you from moving on to the CO qualifier to try to get a plane ticket elsewhere. Granted you were playing a totally off the wall Dragonne warband so you might have not been taking it too seriously.....

Exactly. But let me ask you for a second how long do you imagine that trip was planned for? Its not like I'd go and not play? And the Colorado guys are really fun. Plus, I owe sienar a beating. [:)]


And yes Dagni did the same thing by qualifying in UT and then coming to AZ though he obviously took it much more seriously because he wanted the plane ticket.

Yes, he did, that's the reason for him not dropping when he saw who would be final 4. Last year they simply offered cash. I'd like to see 200/100/50/50 offered up as prizes, in addition to quals, but no airfare. Win what you can.

I'd be perfectly happy if they took away the plane tickets for the qualifiers and gave them to the top 20-25 DCI players so they didn't have to work for it. That way those players listed in the top 20 or so can actually be there.

The idea is that DCI system is easier to skew, so a qualifier is a truer test. But both may attend.

Like the guys from Columbia, Costa Rica or Australia who might not be able to make it otherwise even if invited. Then it'd actually be a World Championship instead of a North American Championship with a few guys from Europe.

Daniel Tick from Brasil is coming as well. Still not quite a world championship, but better than the world series, in any event.

You're right lots of people have earned it and I'd be fine if they were given a freebie just for busting their asses and winning so much.

This encourages the establishment of small playgroups with one dominant player. Maybe its good for the game, but it strikes me as not.

As far as the qualifier layout I think it's lousy. You can't convince me otherwise simply because ...that's how I feel.

Ok. Can't argue with that.

"To me there are locations that are obviously far too easy and others that are obviously effectively a small grinder. So I think the layout is horrid as a result of that fact. End of story."

Agreed. The funny thing is, the location of the mini grinder may vary from year to year. Last year AZ was viewed as one of the easier quals. This year, it was pretty tough.

As far as the sarcasm goes, I couched my remarks pretty well as the end. I wanted to make a strong argument, but to let you know simply that there is another side. You've told me what you (unswayable) position is, so I'm really only trying to explain that there are many folks that agree in part with your statements, but disagree with many of the overt points. This is not intended to belittle your points in any way.



Let it be.

neilasaurus
Sneak
Sneak
134 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 8:07 PM  
Well at least one person got your joke about the ringer. I thought it was hilarious. (He is talking about a previous nonqualifier tournament I went to in Maryland.)
And speaking of the event at which I was a ringer, hopefully sometime tonight, probably around 12 pm pacific, I pray that I will recieve DCI points for that event, which has been in doubt for the quite some time. The reason I mention this here is because it brings up another very good reason why people would play in multiple qualifiers, even if already qualified. It would be the primary reason I would still have played in FL, in the event I had qualified in MD... The qualifiers will be reported! I have travelled all over FL to go to different events that I was under the impression would be sanctioned, and even travelled to MD twice. So far I have been in 11 constructed tournaments that I went to with the understanding they would be sanctioned. So far I have had 4 give me actual DCI points. Tomorrow I will probably get 2 more from the 2 tournaments in MD. Still, that leaves 5 out of 11 that never got reported. I myself felt like quitting recently because I was getting frustrated that so many tournaments I had done well in went unreported, while my 2 disasters went through within 2 days.
Here in FL we had perhaps an extreme situation with a certain venue getting something like 50 tournaments retroactively invalidated. Still, when I look through the tournament locator for other places, I see lots of tournaments that say invalidated or deliquent. So for a lot of people, I guess the qualifier is one of the few chances they have for some assurance that their hard won games will actually be reported. So I can't really blame people for playing in as many as they can afford, I sure would have. I wish I had gone to more qualifiers, even if I didn't qualify, as long I actually gained some DCI points that would be reported.


Vrecknidj
Warlord
Warlord
10252 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

United States

06/13/2006 8:59 PM  
[brief exit from main thread, but still on topic]

Last year, at the Michigan qualifier, I drove up, with no solid tournament experience, and virtually no Constructed tournament experience, and placed 5th. The friend I drove up with placed 6th. We drove across the state, had a great time on the way up, had to play each other in the very first match (sigh), and then still managed to do okay.

We got into the top 8, and then both lost and were eliminated. I was frustrated, of course, but not demoralizied. In my very first qualifier (and it was fairly big), I came in 5th place. I was damn proud.

Since then, it's been all Limited events for me, Alex and my other friend. We've played Constructed, just not DCI. We played in the Midwest Open and got creamed, but had fun.

As the three of us practiced this year, a few things happened. First, I waivered between triple or quadruple HH, and decided against it for a number of reasons. Second, Alex really wanted to play CE, but couldn't quite build a band to do what needed to be done.

So, I talked Alex and my other friend into playing Couatl/Kord/CoDA/Bodyguard. I persuaded Alex. Dan chose Rikka over the Bodyguard even though I tried and tried to talk him out of it.

Alex wanted to play "his own" band. As we kept practicing, I showed him that he had to decide between 1) playing "his own" band and 2) qualifying.

He agreed. He placed 6th and 7th in what I believe have been the two largest US qualifiers. And, his 6th place showing was decided in a less-than-positive way (and he'd probably have finished 2nd had he won).

A sour taste? You bet. But only in the Ypsilanti qualifier, and I've done my best to leave that alone, now that I've cleared things up with the TO.

Alex isn't frustrated that he didn't qualify. He'd have liked to, that's for sure, but his losses this time were to Newtoncain and bshugg. And hey, for a 17-year old, if you're going to lose to someone...

So, what lessons learned? Play. Just play. If you have to play your own band, you might not make it because you might not be playing the best band for the occasion. If that upsets you, then, well, that upsets you.

I may never qualify again. Who knows. I'll try. If I try and take 5th again and again, I'll probably complain--I know myself. I'll probably complain that I play in huge qualifiers and go 5-2 or 6-2 and don't make it, and someone else goes 3-2 and does make it because his qualifier is smaller.

But, I'll eventually get over it and go back to playing.

I've never played competitive games before. Sure, I've played chess, but I have no ranking. I've never once played Magic, I have never played Chainmail or Warhammer or Mage Knight or anything else. Only DDM. It's a blast and I love it. Sometimes, I get ticked off, sometimes I get a little pouty about my lack of success, but, I eventually get back to it.

Dave

Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing;
My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right!

sienar
Sergeant
Sergeant
636 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 9:57 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Tried
Exactly. But let me ask you for a second how long do you imagine that trip was planned for? Its not like I'd go and not play? And the Colorado guys are really fun. Plus, I owe sienar a beating. [:)]



You're gonna have to wait a couple more months now for that. [)]

[http://www.hordelings.com/frontend/profiles/profile.php?user_id=22]

ruhk69
Warrior
Warrior
205 Posts

View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/13/2006 10:29 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by guyf


So, while it is 100% reasonable, acceptable, and useful for a player to travel to multiple qualifiers, even if they already qualified, it's also 100% reasonable, acceptable, and useful for some other player to say that such things turn them off of the game.

It's *not* reasonable for a player to say that folks shouldn't be allowed to travel to multiple qualifiers. If that were reasonable, the qualifier rules would contain that restriction. According to the qualifier rules, competitive players are entitled to multiple chances to compete.



Guy, respectfully I have to both disagree and agree with what you have said here.
First; just because it is in the qualifier rules doesn't mean it must be reasonable and vice versa. Sometimes rules need to be changed to fit the needs of those being ruled..
That said, I still agree with the idea that it is NOT reasonable to say that people cannot travel to multiple qualifiers. This game has a large factor of luck in it and there has been many skilled players who lost key games and qualifying spots over the dice rolls. I don't think it would do the game any good to shut the door on anyone who wants another shot at it. It may do the game good to restrict those who do qualify to stop them from competing in additional ones, though.

The Waterboy. Proud member of Team Amish.
D&D Miniatures
Guru

guyf
Sergeant
Sergeant
545 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 1:30 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by ruhk69

First; just because it is in the qualifier rules doesn't mean it must be reasonable and vice versa.

I wasn't clear enough in my earlier post. Sadly, as I reread the part you quoted, I realize I didn't convey that point well at all; it even contradicts something else I said in that post. What I mean is this:

It's *not* reasonable for a player to criticize another player for travelling to multiple qualifiers this year.

quote:
This game has a large factor of luck in it and there has been many skilled players who lost key games and qualifying spots over the dice rolls.

Which brings up another point: In previous years, you needed to be at a certain skill level to qualify in a qualifier. It appears that – because of the growth of the game – there are more players at that skill level than there were in previous years. However, the number of qualifier spots has stayed about the same. As a result, on average, you need to have *increased* your skill level compared to last year to have a chance at qualifying.

The cold hard truth is that a player shouldn't feel like they ought to be able to qualify this year simply because they were able to qualify in previous years. The bar has been raised, and even if your skill level has kept up with the bar, there are enough other people at that skill level for you to be part of the unlucky bunch.

I'm sure there will be quite a few *very strong* players who won't qualify this year despite entering at least one qualifier. As I peruse today's adjusted DCI ratings, I see quite a few familiar names who are ranked in the gray area where they might not get an invitation based on rating, and who haven't been able to qualify despite attempting at least one qualifier.

-
Guy Fullerton
Official D&D Miniatures Net Rep

Dagni
Sergeant
Sergeant
870 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 2:57 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by robbdaman

First off you guys seem to be taking this personally and it's not a personal thing. I never named names nor did I direct my comments as being toward any individual.

All the following isn't to comment on the ongoing debate/argument at all. I don't want this to be antagonistic or offensive either, though it might come out that way. All I want to do is explain why some of us might take a general statement very personally.

This sounds a LOT like something someone said to me in a different argument on Maxminis. He was right that I took what he said personally - in fact, it turned out I totally misunderstood what he meant. However, he seemed to think that I shouldn't have taken it personally. That is, while his statement wasn't directed at me personally (and it sounded like it might have been), he was wrong in thinking that's WHY I took it personally. Likewise, I'm sure you don't think I should take what you said personally.

In that other thread, the person used the words "'top players'". Likewise, you said, "Add the fact that there were going to be so many out of towners at our qualifier due to SoCal not having one and we lost a lot of local players that could have come. The overcompetitive factor of top players coming from out of state ruins the local scene. It's something I think sucks big time as well." First, that sure sounds specific to the AZ qualifier. But secondly, the words "top players" are there again.

I don't know a very high percentage of all the great players of this game. However, I have personally met and gotten to know almost ALL of the players generally regarded as 'top players' in quotes or that are well-known enough for locals to hear they are coming to town and already know that they are, in fact, top players. So when someone uses the term 'top players', there's a chance that I will get offended on behalf of my friends, even if it doesn't apply to me personally at all. Of course, I might get offended only because I misunderstand what the other person was trying to say - but even so, such comments ARE personal. (Especially when SoCal is mentioned specifically). I really do know THAT many of the highly visible and highly touted players of this game.

To use an extreme, obviously made-up example, if someone says, "Top players are total jerks", that would personally offend me. Always, every time. I would be offended on behalf of doubtofbuddha, Pat Lynch, Pat Ellis (whether he would think he belonged in the group or not [)]), Bshugg, kiddoc, and many others. Sometimes, you don't have to name names to offend, or for something to be personal to the other party. Disclaimer: that doesn't even mean what you said, robbdamon, was even offensive.

Dwayne and Jason probably know a lot of the top players of the game as well, they've been to almost every tournament I've ever been to. They certainly know the top players from SoCal as well as I do.

I hope that helps clarify.

- Dagni


Proud member of the GRUUMSH fan club!

kingnanu
Warrior
Warrior
214 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 3:11 AM  
Now Guys is it really fair that the whole crew from California all jump on Rob as a group for feeling the the way he does? I seen some of the biggest names in DDM take turns bashing him and not until guyf last couple of posts did any of you think about the other side of the arguement. I was at the AZ qualifier and got creamed by every Socal player I faced. It was a long frustrating afternoon. Thats great, I'll get over it. It was a real eye opener at how truely competitive the current metagame really is and I just wasn't ready for the onslaught! The problem I see from a local perspective is that it temporarily killed our local game. As Rob has stated before we have a lot of "casual players". He and I have been working REALLY HARD over the last year to proliferate the interest in the game. "Casual Players" eventually become competitive players and that is what I and I think Rob are trying to build. A competive DDM environment. Players like Daggni, Tried, and GuyF(those are just the ones I know)don't grow on trees. It takes time for new players to learn all of the ins and out of the game. If they never come back then everyone loses. Just my thoughts.

Randall

Called shot for blood war: Leonal

Felagund
Sergeant
Sergeant
922 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 11:54 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by kingnanu

The problem I see from a local perspective is that it temporarily killed our local game. As Rob has stated before we have a lot of "casual players". He and I have been working REALLY HARD over the last year to proliferate the interest in the game. "Casual Players" eventually become competitive players and that is what I and I think Rob are trying to build. A competive DDM environment.

This is a valid concern, and something that I feel is worth discussing. I imagine there are plenty of people on Maxminis who have experiences with trying to build a competitive DDM scene in their area. I think that getting input from the community on this is going to be much more productive than pointing figures and trying to turn AZ into the next Tampa.

Champion of Gnomes

robby
Sergeant
Sergeant
918 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 12:08 PM  

I have to ask, though. If they (specifically in this case the AZ local group) really want to become competitive, shouldn't they walk away from the Qualifier with an agenda to get better, rather than feeling down on the game? Sure, they may have lost (even horribly) - but at least now they know where the bar is, and if they truly want to play at a competitive level, they now know where they have to get to. You know - an attitude of "Okay, now we know how the big boys play. What do we have to do to get there?"

Now, if the guys building the scene touted the Qualifier as "Hey come to this, it will be fun and you might win a trip to Gencon", it sounds like incorrect expectations may have been set. I expected our QT in Texas to be bloodthirsty. Luckily it wasn't (too much, at least), but my expectation was that it would be pretty competitive - and I was chomping at the bit to see how I compared to the "top players". Whether those were national top players or just Texas ones, I wanted to see how I fared in that field. I did both better and worse than I thought I might, but now I have a better idea of what will be required next year to Qualify - and to win a ticket, too. [}:)]


To the list with you!

Email: robby.anderson@yahoo.com | H/W List | My Trade Interface | Reference Thread/Completed Trades

GiliusThunderHead
Sneak
Sneak
98 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 12:15 PM  


I'll go out on a limb and say,

"Top Players are Jerks"!!!

Booyaa, how you like me know?
On the other hand I will also say,
"Why is everyone whining so hard about the qualifiers"?

Anyway, true, the Socal scene is cut-throat, yes we love to get your goat, yes we are A-holes. Most of us have NO IDEA how to be GRACIOUS WINNERS, this has been told to me by several observers and is obvious to me as well, as it should be obvious to those who read this thread, and many others like it.

Another point, it's painfully obvious that people who have qualified in 1 qualifier, then travel to another qualifier and make top 4 there as well are REALLY cheesing off the locals. Here is the problem, instead of working on a better solution,many of the self-righteous DDM "Elite" is too busy defending thier "RIGHT" to go to as many qualifiers as they want.... pathetic... either tell people to F-off like men or be a sportsman, encourage your competition, find constructive ways to contribute, or at the very least be OPEN to LISTENING and not too busy defending you rights. LOL as if "qualifier" tournament rules were f-ing gospel etched in stone. Also, the root of the problem is not people PLAYING in multiple qualifiers, it's them qualifying in multiple qualifiers, right?

That being said, I'm from Socal, and I am going to multiple qualifiers.. but I haven't qualified yet, so don't throw stones.

Another thing, people who have already qualified who are traveling to other states, incurring costs that are greater than the price of airfare to Indy, and then they say they just want to win the airfare, are just full of $hit!! I ain't buyin' it. Whatever your reasons for qualifying multiple times, airfare is for sure not it.

Of course, national qualifiers are not for the faint of heart, and whining is always gonna bring admonishment from me. There is both excessive whining, and excessive chest thumping going on here. No big deal though, we are in a competition, so both are to be expected.

So, in closing, Socal Elite DDMers, please stop embarassing yourselves and more importantly, me and other non-elite Socal players, with your constant, "well, we ARE the best and we have the RIGHT to blah blah... ad naseum" and I'm a "top player" so if you say "top players" then of course you mean me! (you can take a little criticism Dagni, I mean why even mention this?? another chance to reiterate your dominance? Everyone knows you rock!)


That being said, I love you all.... and may you all drown in pools of your own minis' blood....

--GiliusThunderHead


Tried
Sergeant
Sergeant
496 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 12:51 PM  
.....and.....thank you, Gil.

This from the only guy in Maxminis whose handle sounds like a porn name....

The thread has degenerated from Kith's original purpose to more of a "are qualifiers designed to support local casual play."

The answer is probably no. Prereleases are probably for that, as are the Open tournaments. I would be happy to run an open tournament in another state if asked. I don't konw why - I just do that kind of stuff. I wasted a lot of money flying to SF last year to run events at ConQuest SF, so don't question my motives for flying around and visiting. I love traveling and doing the whole ddm thing. I like running events.

As far as comp vs casual goes, You don't see those a-holes from socal or Norcal traveling for pre-releases, do ya? (even when they don't have one?)

And as far as winning graciously goes,- speak for yourself. The only person I don't win graciously against is you, and that's on purpose, mostly because its kinda funny.

BTW, I really, really, love you, but not in a porn-name kinda way.



Let it be.

SneakyJoeKDB
Sergeant
Sergeant
585 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Utah

06/14/2006 12:52 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by GiliusThunderHead



I'll go out on a limb and say,

"Top Players are Jerks"!!!

Booyaa, how you like me know?
On the other hand I will also say,
"Why is everyone whining so hard about the qualifiers"?

Anyway, true, the Socal scene is cut-throat, yes we love to get your goat, yes we are A-holes. Most of us have NO IDEA how to be GRACIOUS WINNERS, this has been told to me by several observers and is obvious to me as well, as it should be obvious to those who read this thread, and many others like it.

Another point, it's painfully obvious that people who have qualified in 1 qualifier, then travel to another qualifier and make top 4 there as well are REALLY cheesing off the locals. Here is the problem, instead of working on a better solution,many of the self-righteous DDM "Elite" is too busy defending thier "RIGHT" to go to as many qualifiers as they want.... pathetic... either tell people to F-off like men or be a sportsman, encourage your competition, find constructive ways to contribute, or at the very least be OPEN to LISTENING and not too busy defending you rights. LOL as if "qualifier" tournament rules were f-ing gospel etched in stone. Also, the root of the problem is not people PLAYING in multiple qualifiers, it's them qualifying in multiple qualifiers, right?

That being said, I'm from Socal, and I am going to multiple qualifiers.. but I haven't qualified yet, so don't throw stones.

Another thing, people who have already qualified who are traveling to other states, incurring costs that are greater than the price of airfare to Indy, and then they say they just want to win the airfare, are just full of $hit!! I ain't buyin' it. Whatever your reasons for qualifying multiple times, airfare is for sure not it.

Of course, national qualifiers are not for the faint of heart, and whining is always gonna bring admonishment from me. There is both excessive whining, and excessive chest thumping going on here. No big deal though, we are in a competition, so both are to be expected.

So, in closing, Socal Elite DDMers, please stop embarassing yourselves and more importantly, me and other non-elite Socal players, with your constant, "well, we ARE the best and we have the RIGHT to blah blah... ad naseum" and I'm a "top player" so if you say "top players" then of course you mean me! (you can take a little criticism Dagni, I mean why even mention this?? another chance to reiterate your dominance? Everyone knows you rock!)


That being said, I love you all.... and may you all drown in pools of your own minis' blood....

--GiliusThunderHead



Preach on Brother!

"Like a thief in the Night"



2005 D&D Miniatures Champion
Fenris
Sergeant
Sergeant
974 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 1:41 PM  
Gil, your brand of humor doesn't translate too well online. I'm betting people who don't know you are rather befuddled by that last post. [:D]

Anyway I think this thread has passed the point of useful conversation. There's a lot more that could be said on the various topics in question, but I think there's too much bickering going on for it to be well-received in this particular thread.



Read my championship tournament report.
Successful trades:
xBrendanx | Cha0tic G0od | ThatOneGuy | BrazenWood | Finley | Arris | Drift x2 | Neonmage | Cthulu's Librarian | Kalvos | PatEllis15 | Paradox1995 | Rhane | Gildogg | Darthrau | Vrecknidj x2 | erian_7 | Octavius Drowslayer x2 | stheis | Garate | thenameless | Lucky_ksu | ckissee | Corim Danex | Schooly_D | Username

Gunthar
Commander
Commander
2938 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 1:50 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by GiliusThunderHead



'Blah, blah, blah' (edited for bandwidth concerns)
--GiliusThunderHead



Okay, your sense of humor is, well.....probably doesn't translate very well, but I found it funny.

Champion of Prit(Wemic vindication is here)
Minneapolis/St. Paul area
Completed trades: Aspect of Cheese (Love that moniker), Tickparasite, Elderthing, Lalato, Sodj, Grimoire, SmilinIrish, Zeb, RWarehall,Link, wikkawikkawa, Auramancer, Rommers, HK, Ivid5,Qillan_dvra, Puggins, Arcabius, Ironfist Boulderbender, Robby, Corim Danex, monster_slayer, DNDJUNKIE, Kelemvor, Krush, ckissee, Massawyrm, hockey fan, Wish, Uninspiring Lieutenant, vtloon x2, Vrecknidj, Darthpoke, WakeXX, AnarionZell, lycusmike, papabear5 and umpteen local trades with board members
Hero of Skirmish
doubtofbuddha
Commander
Commander
3371 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


06/14/2006 1:58 PM  
I agree. If you want to discuss subtopics from this thread further, feel free to start a new thread or three.

I am not gone.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 3 of 3 << < 123




ActiveForums 3.7
Play Dreamblade Now!