| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
| | Author | Messages | |
Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 6234 Posts



 Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.
 | | 05/01/2008 8:26 AM |
| Posted By sienar on 04/30/2008 6:04 PM Posted By Turboman on 04/30/2008 5:49 PM Well then you'd have to go with higher ranking or something as flawed as it is. Still better than groups colluding to get their buddies in.
You may want to make sure your information is fully accurate before making statements like this one.
Please go look at the top 2 standings so far and come back here and tell me how many invites have been "stolen" so far. Come back after the season and give me that number again. Perhaps this issue is not as big a deal as people think it is. People are already dropping, and not just in collusion.
I agree, I don't see this being nearly as big a problem as it could be. But, it's the could be part that has the discussion going.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon
"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/01/2008 9:30 AM |
| | Brig, I was under the impression that rating slots don't get passed down anymore. Or at least they don't get passed down more than once? Am I wrong on this? | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Turboman Warrior
 210 Posts




 | | 05/01/2008 9:33 AM |
| | Who knows? I can't keep up with the changes. | | | |
|  Vrecknidj Warlord
 9938 Posts


 United States
 | | 05/01/2008 11:34 AM |
| Posted By greyhaze on 04/30/2008 8:38 PM I say we all just show up and roll a d20, highest rolls have a dice off until all but one are ELIMINATED, that person then gets to design a mini. :) I have proposed this locally, except that it's Swiss pairings. It's a nice, new, easy-to-play game (no harder than Deal or No Deal).
You get paired with an opponent, you both roll d20, higher roll wins. Reroll on a tie. Next match, you get paired against someone with the same record, repeat.
Within an hour, we could finish a 150+ person event, declare a winner, hand out prizes, and go do other cool stuff at the convention.
Dave
| | Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing; My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right! | |
| TheChozyn Skirmisher
 3 Posts



 | | 05/01/2008 11:47 AM |
| My suggestions to the names of the brackets:
The Thrifty 32 The Savvy 16 The Egomaniacal 8 The Fortunate 4 | | Proud member of D.A.M.: Mothers Against Dyslexia | |
| mege Sneak
 51 Posts



 | | 05/01/2008 12:08 PM |
| Posted By Vrecknidj on 05/01/2008 11:34 AM Posted By greyhaze on 04/30/2008 8:38 PM I say we all just show up and roll a d20, highest rolls have a dice off until all but one are ELIMINATED, that person then gets to design a mini. :) I have proposed this locally, except that it's Swiss pairings. It's a nice, new, easy-to-play game (no harder than Deal or No Deal). You get paired with an opponent, you both roll d20, higher roll wins. Reroll on a tie. Next match, you get paired against someone with the same record, repeat. Within an hour, we could finish a 150+ person event, declare a winner, hand out prizes, and go do other cool stuff at the convention. Dave      Â
Reminds me of the rock-paper-scissors tournament at gencon - that's hilarious to watch! | | | |
| Brig Skirmisher
 19 Posts




 | | 05/01/2008 12:16 PM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/01/2008 9:30 AM Brig, I was under the impression that rating slots don't get passed down anymore. Or at least they don't get passed down more than once? Am I wrong on this?
They are not getting passed down but a qualifier spot is not being taken away or "stolen". Let's say there are 35 qualifiers with top 2 being qualified. That is 70 qualifead persons. You also invite the top 100. Because of the level of tournament nearly all of the top 2's will be in the top 100 because we all started the season at 1600. So that leaves 30 spots for top 100. If one player finished 2nd in one qualifier and then wins a later one there will only be 69 qualified via qualifiers which will in turn add one (up to 31) to those just qualifying by being in top 100. (This is unique to this season only)
This is a very unique season since everyone started with 1600 and you almost guarantee a top 100 spot just by finishing in the top 2 of a qualifier. | | | |
| Barry Skirmisher
 35 Posts



 | | 05/01/2008 3:07 PM |
| Some thoughts on this topic.
Given the few qualifiers there are and the geographic distribution of them, its not unrealistic that people think of them as "their" qualifiers. When out of area people come into town and win them, it does build the feeling of "stealing" spots. This tends to build a sense of frustration with the game at least on the competitive level. My "local" qualifier was MD. Some of the locals here didnt want to make the trip knowing that the Amish would be decending in force on the tourney. Are they the best players in the world that might win Gencon? Doubtful, but they are players who are no longer making an effort to expand the competitive side of the game.   Why travel 2+ hours when a bunch of "ringers" are coming into town.Â
I think the system of top 100 plus qualifiers is a bad one. It spreads discontent with the system. I liked it alot better where top 4 from each qualifier can go.Â
Id also say to make it so that you can only play in one qualifier. You get one chance. Win or go home instead of win and go to another and another and another. Pick the date of the semi local tournament and do your best. It will solve some of the hard feelings that come with playing against a player that plays in every qualifier within 500 miles and who is already qualified.Â
    Someone said that this would be bad since one bad day could ruin your chances. Well to compare to other "professional" games, there's no second chances in the NFL playoffs. How many games are won by or lost by the last minute field goal.  Im sure the Patriots would love another shot the Giants.Â
Barry
| | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/01/2008 3:32 PM |
| I like going to other areas to play. I get to play people I never played before. If it wasn't for qualifiers, I'd only be able to play new people in the championships (not that going to UT did that for me, playing 5/6 rounds against the people I came with). Not to mention that qualifiers feel like the only non XP/Gencon tournaments where it feels bigger then local weekend play.
I'd really love it if players would come to SoCal and invade us for a change. Unfortunately we aren't in a centralized location suited for having that happen, and in previous years, our nearest qualifier was 7 hours away, that makes stuff like AZ, our home qualifier. Even UT was only another 3-4 hours difference, and you have just hit our 3rd closest qualifier.(at least in previous years)
I really wish they'd go back to the old qualifier system with top 4. Or just add top 4 to what we have now. The 4 allows there to be a sense of "locals" getting in even if invaders take some as well. I'd also have no problem if they made the damn championships open and get rid of all this crap. Then just play for travel/product/passes.
BTW, Professional Sports, doesn't use a D20. That kind of impacts the argument I think. | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 6234 Posts



 Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.
 | | 05/01/2008 3:44 PM |
| Not using a D20 doesn't mean there isn't luck involved. DDM also doesn't involve mandatory uniforms, but the relation still holds on basic levels.
I like the single Qualifier idea, personally. If you want to get in by ranking, that's the equivalent of the regualr season. I think of the Qualifiers as the Conference tournaments in NCAA Basketball. Win to get in, and a strong showing may get you a top 100 bid.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon
"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/01/2008 3:51 PM |
| | While this is true, I dont't think sports games are based on nearly as much luck as DDM. A game with "as much" luck as DDM, should have multiple qualifiers to negate it. | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Turboman Warrior
 210 Posts




 | | 05/01/2008 3:57 PM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/01/2008 3:32 PM I like going to other areas to play. I get to play people I never played before. If it wasn't for qualifiers, I'd only be able to play new people in the championships (not that going to UT did that for me, playing 5/6 rounds against the people I came with). Not to mention that qualifiers feel like the only non XP/Gencon tournaments where it feels bigger then local weekend play.
I'd really love it if players would come to SoCal and invade us for a change. Unfortunately we aren't in a centralized location suited for having that happen, and in previous years, our nearest qualifier was 7 hours away, that makes stuff like AZ, our home qualifier. Even UT was only another 3-4 hours difference, and you have just hit our 3rd closest qualifier.(at least in previous years)
I really wish they'd go back to the old qualifier system with top 4. Or just add top 4 to what we have now. The 4 allows there to be a sense of "locals" getting in even if invaders take some as well. I'd also have no problem if they made the damn championships open and get rid of all this crap. Then just play for travel/product/passes.
BTW, Professional Sports, doesn't use a D20. That kind of impacts the argument I think. There is one in Simi Valley this year, that should make you happy. Of course if you're in San Diego are that is still 5 hours away or so huh?
| | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/01/2008 4:01 PM |
| | 2.5 or so I think. We are definately happy with having a "local" qualifier now, and hope it stays that way. | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Barry Skirmisher
 35 Posts



 | | 05/01/2008 5:21 PM |
| While I wont argue the luck vs skill factor of professional games, the relationship is the same. We all are attempting to minimize the luck factor and maximize the skill factor. We pick pieces with the best stats, ie tier 1, to minimize our luck factor while maximizing our opponents. In a game of near equal opponents, luck can be the deciding factor. Whether a 1 on a d20 or a fumble in football. While I understand about visiting new places and meeting people. My only real play is qualifiers and pre releases. Our local scene is pretty much dead. I enjoy going to places and getting 4-5 games with a real person, thats the main reason I go. But that shouldnt be a factor in a "qualifier" event. If you taking the best of each area of the country and putting them in a championship, you shouldnt allow people to keep trying in different areas.
In reality though if you think about this qualifier stuff. Its mostly qualified people playing other qualified people for the plane ticket. I like the original system best. Top 4 go, 1 gets a ticket.
Barry | | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/01/2008 5:52 PM |
| | But what if say 5 people in one region are better than everyone in another region. Should the worse players be more "entitled" to a spot because of their geographic location? Is that fair? | | SoCal Colluder | |
|  Vrecknidj Warlord
 9938 Posts


 United States
 | | 05/01/2008 7:11 PM |
| Posted By Barry on 05/01/2008 3:07 PM     Someone said that this would be bad since one bad day could ruin your chances. Well to compare to other "professional" games, there's no second chances in the NFL playoffs. How many games are won by or lost by the last minute field goal.  Im sure the Patriots would love another shot the Giants.Â
Well, there were millions upon millions of dollars on the line, so, the comparison has some weaknesses.
Dave
| | Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing; My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right! | |
| Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 6234 Posts



 Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.
 | | 05/01/2008 9:01 PM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/01/2008 5:52 PM But what if say 5 people in on region are better than everyone in another reason. Should the worse players be more "entitled" to a spot because of their geographic location? Is that fair?
I won't sy one way or the other if it's fair, but it does happen. Look at the NBA playoofs this year, and the records of the Western non-playoff teams and some of the Estern Playoff teams. the 8th Eastern seed lost 7-10 moregames than the 9th western seed (which didn't make the playoffs) But that same 8 seed has taken the team with the best record to at least 6 games of elimination, much farther than anyone expected. Luck plays its part everywhere. I don't know if the 5th bestperson in one area should go if they are better than the 2nd best in another area.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon
"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
| Barry Skirmisher
 35 Posts



 | | 05/01/2008 10:26 PM |
| But what if say 5 people in one region are better than everyone in another region. Should the worse players be more "entitled" to a spot because of their geographic location? Is that fair?
I wont say its fair, but I will say its the purpose of regional type qualifiers. One person is going to better than everyone else out there. That is the point of it all. If your a football fan, should the AFC send more to the playoffs than the NFC if the AFC has teams with better records? Your taking the best of each zone and putting them into a championship. Yes some are better than others. It will always be the case. Qualifier hopping to get a ticket only breaks down the system and causes hardship.
Maybe Bob in BFE isnt that good of a player, but if he won his local qualifier and went to Gencon, wouldnt he have a story to tell when he got back? Wouldnt that make some kind of excitment in the local scene with Bob's playing group? Bob will be telling stories for days about how close he got, whether he went 0-7 or not. Instead Bob will never know since some Top 10 guy drove 6+ hours out to get a plane ticket when he could have saved the gas money and bought one himself. (note this isnt directed at you Kev, even though you sorta fit the example)
Well, there were millions upon millions of dollars on the line, so, the comparison has some weaknesses.
Really? we get $2000 for moving little plastic figures around a board and rolling dice. Is it really a stretch? If DDM had the fanbase of the NFL im sure the prize would be higher :)
Barry | | | |
| Knight of the Round Table Thenameless Warlord
 8472 Posts



 The Fortress of Solitude
 | | 05/02/2008 2:25 AM |
| Posted By Barry on 05/01/2008 3:07 PM
    Someone said that this would be bad since one bad day could ruin your chances. Well to compare to other "professional" games, there's no second chances in the NFL playoffs. How many games are won by or lost by the last minute field goal.  Im sure the Patriots would love another shot the Giants.Â
Barry
Your point is valid. However, we can always choose analogies that support our positions. Of the four major North American team sports (baseball, basketball, football, and hockey), only football chooses to employ the one game elimination format. The other three major sports use a "best of 7" to determine their champion. These three leagues believe that the truly better team is more accurately determined by having to beat their opponent four times - reduces the effects of either team having one good or one bad day. I agree with this assertion. So, allowing the stronger players to compete in more than one qualifier, reduces their chances of being penalized by having one bad day of dice/match-ups. | | Over 270 successful online DDM trades. | |
| Knight of the Round Table Thenameless Warlord
 8472 Posts



 The Fortress of Solitude
 | | 05/02/2008 2:43 AM |
| Posted By Barry on 05/01/2008 10:26 PM But what if say 5 people in one region are better than everyone in another region. Should the worse players be more "entitled" to a spot because of their geographic location? Is that fair? I wont say its fair, but I will say its the purpose of regional type qualifiers. One person is going to better than everyone else out there. That is the point of it all. If your a football fan, should the AFC send more to the playoffs than the NFC if the AFC has teams with better records? Your taking the best of each zone and putting them into a championship. Yes some are better than others. It will always be the case. Qualifier hopping to get a ticket only breaks down the system and causes hardship. Maybe Bob in BFE isnt that good of a player, but if he won his local qualifier and went to Gencon, wouldnt he have a story to tell when he got back? Wouldnt that make some kind of excitment in the local scene with Bob's playing group? Bob will be telling stories for days about how close he got, whether he went 0-7 or not. Instead Bob will never know since some Top 10 guy drove 6+ hours out to get a plane ticket when he could have saved the gas money and bought one himself. (note this isnt directed at you Kev, even though you sorta fit the example) Well, there were millions upon millions of dollars on the line, so, the comparison has some weaknesses. Really? we get $2000 for moving little plastic figures around a board and rolling dice. Is it really a stretch? If DDM had the fanbase of the NFL im sure the prize would be higher :) Barry I am very much a sports fan in general, and football ranks high on the list of my favourites. Again, you are correct in that the AFC and NFC should send the same number of teams to the playoffs. The flip side of the coin is this. You'll remember in the early-mid 90's when the Cowboys had the triplets of Aikman, Emmitt, and Irvin, and the Niners had that really strong team with Young, Rice, and Deion. Everyone said that the "real" Super Bowl was the NFC final. The same thing happened in the AFC two seasons ago when Brady and Manning went head-to-head in the AFC final - that was the "real" Super Bowl. I'm sure that unless the viewer was a fan of the Chargers that got killed by the Niners, or the Bears that got handily beaten by the Colts, most people would rather have seen the NFC final or the AFC final as the Super Bowl.
| | Over 270 successful online DDM trades. | |
| JAdams44978 Skirmisher
 1 Posts



 | | 05/02/2008 3:46 AM |
| | I wish people would stop whining about calluding and team play. Get over it! Let them come to our qualifier, all of them! It will make our victory over them much more sweeter. Qualifier and championships have nothing to do with fostering the "game community" because when money and fame are on the line then anything goes. Bringing new people into the game should limit itself to unrated or just simply local events and should having nothing in common with the qualifer season when those new players should expect a different atmosphere altogther. Suck it up people! | | | |
| Sirohk Commander
 3712 Posts



 USA
 | | 05/02/2008 4:05 AM |
| Posted By JAdams44978 on 05/02/2008 3:46 AM I wish people would stop whining about calluding and team play. Get over it! Let them come to our qualifier, all of them! It will make our victory over them much more sweeter. Qualifier and championships have nothing to do with fostering the "game community" because when money and fame are on the line then anything goes. Bringing new people into the game should limit itself to unrated or just simply local events and should having nothing in common with the qualifer season when those new players should expect a different atmosphere altogther. Suck it up people! Welcome to the boards and well said.Â
Everyone wants to be Qualified, not everyone is going to get Qualified.Â
I do agree that: 1) Top 4 (minimum) should get invites, and this should be based on Qualifier attendance (per Daves suggestion). 2) IMO WotC will invite Top 100, and maybe there will be other ways to get invited to Championships (ie 2 Grinders) 3) There are indeed more Qualifiers this year. 4) Attend as many Qualifiers as you can. It is the best practice in the world as you usually will be facing some of the best players in the world. Mingle with them afterwards, ask them questions, watch them play, its one of the best ways to learn the game even better. Heck, we have a whole bunch of new folks at our local FLGS and I for one will be encouraging them to participate in the local Qualifier. 5) It is going to be a weird year with new rules, new sets, and new lots of other stuff. 6) As suggested by others, there are things WotC can do to fix things and improve and grow the game and I'm sure they are listening to us and working on them to the best of their ability.Â
Nuf said.Â

| | Sirohk, the Bard of Heartstone Knight of the Rahshasa's And Crusader of the Zakya, Ak'chazar, Naztharune, and Naityan Rakshasa's | |
|  Vrecknidj Warlord
 9938 Posts


 United States
 | | 05/02/2008 6:28 AM |
| Posted By Barry on 05/01/2008 10:26 PM Well, there were millions upon millions of dollars on the line, so, the comparison has some weaknesses. Really? we get $2000 for moving little plastic figures around a board and rolling dice. Is it really a stretch? If DDM had the fanbase of the NFL im sure the prize would be higher :) It's a huge stretch. It's an amazingly, ultra, super-duper, uber stretch. The hypothetical that were DDM's fanbase higher that the prizes would be better is correct... except that the fanbase isn't going to grow to 50 million viewers, all of whom directly or indirectly (through ads on TV) support the game.
Some folks have tried going the endorsement route for DDM, wearing logos, T-shirts, etc., while they played at the championship. But, it's nothing like what a professional athlete gets for agreeing to allow his/her image used to sell some product. To stick to the sport theme, the analogy is not only not in the same ballpark, it's not in the same sport.
I agree that the money alters things. The plane ticket and the fact that everyone who makes it to the top 8 gets some cash is a big incentive. But, compared to professional sports, it's insignificant.
Dave
| | Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing; My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right! | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 5473 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 7:43 AM |
| Posted By JAdams44978 on 05/02/2008 3:46 AM Qualifier and championships have nothing to do with fostering the "game community" because when money and fame are on the line then anything goes.
Hey welcome to the boards, and wow, what a crappy attitude to start with.
Qualifiers and championships have EVERYTHING to do with fostering the community. Using more of the invites are already being offered is the BEST way to grow this community. The "suck it up" piss-poor attitude is what pulls a community down. How about lending a hand in making things better instead of just crapping all over someone's else's efforts?
Money and fame? What money, it's peanuts and will stay peanuts unless it grows. And guess what, it's the same for the fame. If the community doesn't grow you'll just be another nerd that rolls dice in his parent's basement and is frowned upon by women that don't understand why a grown man plays with toys instead of being a productive member of society. If it grows it may actually become socially acceptable to play.
Make an effort to help the community or shut your hole (taken from the book of "suck it up"). | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Ghast in Against the Giants, Darkenbeast in Demon Web. | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/02/2008 7:51 AM |
| Obviously you adults dont' have as much of a problem but 2000 dollars is a crap ton of money to me.
So is a plane ticket to gencon for that matter.
I have to pay for all this stuff on my own, I have to sell all the miniatrues I win to go to GenCon and XP. Getting this cheap stufff is the only way I go to the Con | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Turboman Warrior
 210 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 8:33 AM |
| | There is this thing called a "job" you could always give a go. | | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/02/2008 8:47 AM |
| | Coupled with school, I'd no longer have time to play ;P. | | SoCal Colluder | |
| digital13jw Skirmisher
 29 Posts



 | | 05/02/2008 8:49 AM |
| | for the most part if you are going to multiple qualifiers either by driving 4+hr to get to each are you really gaining anything from the plane ticket, maybe getting some money back that you spent to go to the other qualifiers. The only real thing that you gain is the time playing against some of the best players in the different areas. That the only way to get better, how much can you learn by playing the same people over and over and over again, in most cases ifs not really about the plane ticket although it would be nice it's really about the game. If you want to compare it to pro sports say the Seahawks clench a playoff spot and they have 3 games left are they just to concede those last 3 games so other teams can improve there chances to make it to the playoffs??? | | | |
| Turboman Warrior
 210 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 8:58 AM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/02/2008 8:47 AM Coupled with school, I'd no longer have time to play ;P. I attended college and worked and still played. You might not be able to play 10 games a day or whatever but that is how the real world works man.
| | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/02/2008 9:00 AM |
| | I would want to lock down all the fun in my life why? | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Turboman Warrior
 210 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 9:09 AM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/02/2008 9:00 AM I would want to lock down all the fun in my life why? Unless you plan to live with your Mom for the rest of your life you'll have to someday. :P
| | | |
| Kevizoid Warrior
 311 Posts



 Southern California
 | | 05/02/2008 9:13 AM |
| | Someday yes, right now? No! MWHAHAHAA! | | SoCal Colluder | |
| Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 6234 Posts



 Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.
 | | 05/02/2008 9:22 AM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/02/2008 9:00 AM I would want to lock down all the fun in my life why?
Apparently, to go to GenCon... 
In reality, it's nice that we talk about all of this, and how we all hope it will be.
But the reality is that currently, the rules don't preclude soemone from going to every single qualifier they can. Calling them anything derogatory for doing so is assigning arbitrary rules to the game which only exist in your mind. No one else is obligated to play by these rules. Every rule thy are obligated to play by is written down and mostly clear (slow play still being quite subjective, IMHO, but that's another discussion.)
"Growing the community" while a noble goal, is nowhere in the rules. I'm not saying we shouldn't try to (heaven knows I've tried, as a delegate) but it's not written asa rule to be a priority of your competition choices.
Now, being uber-cuthroat and only wanting to win can make you be perceived as a dick. So, I guess it depends on how important perception vs. victory is. You may win, but you may not be liked. And, you may very well keep the game "down" by doing so. Again, not your duty in the rules, but also, neither is being liked. It's an interesting choice of competition vs. comradery.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon
"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
| paradox23 Skirmisher
 5 Posts



 | | 05/02/2008 9:27 AM |
| I think the most important thing to remember is that this is after all, just a game. If I could make it to more than 1 qualifier I absolutely would. I enjoy meeting everyone else who loves to play this game. I like a good excuse to hop in the car and go hundreds of miles.
It cost me a fair bit of change to go play in UT. It was my first qualifier ever. I wasn't expecting to qualify let alone win. I was just hoping to have a lot of fun playing a game I love. Even if I hadn't qualified, I plan on going to GenCon, where I would have at least tried to grind into the championships (where I don't really expect to do well).
I guess my point is, that this so called concept of "invading" is a bit silly. If you can afford it, what on earth is wrong with getting to do a little traveling to play your favorite game and meeting new people that you would normally only see online. It's about fun, community, and camaradarie in my book. Driving through Utah is gorgeous, the ride up with the So Cal crew was fun, meeting and playing with peeps from UT was awesome, and playing DDM with a group that uses different minis strategy than what I see week in and week out is great.
| | | |
| Duke of Spoils greyhaze Warlord
 5473 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 9:51 AM |
| | Absolutely, and I certainly wouldn't want to prevent ppl from going to other qualifiers, because in my mind that IS building community - however, let's pass down the invites which wotc was planning to pass out anyways, and get more people to GenCon. | | Greyhaze's DDM Spoilers Champion of Darkenbeast , Raistlin Majere, Nightmare WDQ25/60, Warduke WD60/60, Anti-Champion of Guns, "Knight of Bugbears", and Joke Champion of Venger. Called Shots: Ghast in Against the Giants, Darkenbeast in Demon Web. | |
|  Vrecknidj Warlord
 9938 Posts


 United States
 | | 05/02/2008 9:58 AM |
| Posted By Kevizoid on 05/02/2008 8:47 AM Coupled with school, I'd no longer have time to play ;P. Welcome to adulthood. With three jobs (okay, two-and-a-half) and editing work on the side, and a wife and two kids, I don't have time to play either. But, I squeeze in just enough so that I can still compete.
Actually, I was thinking of just this thing yesterday. I figured that the teens and twenty-somethings have an edge over everyone else in this game due in no small measure to the amount of time they can invest in it.
Dave
| | Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing; My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right! | |
| Master of the Awesome Sauce Teflon Jeff Warlord
 6234 Posts



 Idaho. Yes, we have Gamers in Idaho.
 | | 05/02/2008 10:09 AM |
| Posted By Vrecknidj on 05/02/2008 9:58 AM Posted By Kevizoid on 05/02/2008 8:47 AM Coupled with school, I'd no longer have time to play ;P. Welcome to adulthood. With three jobs (okay, two-and-a-half) and editing work on the side, and a wife and two kids, I don't have time to play either. But, I squeeze in just enough so that I can still compete. Actually, I was thinking of just this thing yesterday. I figured that the teens and twenty-somethings have an edge over everyone else in this game due in no small measure to the amount of time they can invest in it. Dave
Bah, as 20-something (25) I have even less time. 2 FT job, 2 PT jobs, a wife and two kids under 3, and full-time student. Which is why I probably won't be trying to Qualify this year. But for the most part, yeah, they generally have more time. There's a reason most of the Pro Magic players are in their 20's or teens.
| | Official Delegate, Wizards of the Coast Against The Giants Called Shot: Huge Green Dragon Icons Called Shot: Gargantuan Prismatic Dragon
"Rejoice, for bad things are about to happen." | |
| Barry Skirmisher
 35 Posts



 | | 05/02/2008 10:10 AM |
| Actually, I was thinking of just this thing yesterday. I figured that the teens and twenty-somethings have an edge over everyone else in this game due in no small measure to the amount of time they can invest in it.
Note the ages of the champions lately :)
The whole point to this discussion is that there are two sides to every story. Some people will feel frustrated at "invaders" and some people will welcome them. I can see both sides. Personally I want as many as I can get. More rounds to play and better competition to knock the rust off. I do think that the current top 100 and top 2 qualifier system is flawed and needs work. It should be either/or, not both.
Barry | | | |
|  Vrecknidj Warlord
 9938 Posts


 United States
 | | 05/02/2008 10:23 AM |
| Posted By Teflon Jeff on 05/02/2008 10:09 AM
Bah, as 20-something (25) I have even less time. 2 FT job, 2 PT jobs, a wife and two kids under 3, and full-time student. Which is why I probably won't be trying to Qualify this year. But for the most part, yeah, they generally have more time. There's a reason most of the Pro Magic players are in their 20's or teens.
Geez. You could use a break Jeff. I remember those days (teaching at three schools, while a grad student, with a wife who was a student who also worked three jobs, and we had a kid at home). That was the period of my life when I didn't go to GenCon.

It gets better when they're a little older (the kids, I mean, not the wife).

Dave
| | Knowledge Arcana editor issues 5-9, Phoenix Lore Magazine editor, assistant editor for Rite Publishing; My Trade Thread and My Reference Thread; Winner of WBC IV, IX and XIII; Rule #0: bshugg is always right! | |
| sienar Sergeant
 635 Posts




 | | 05/02/2008 10:47 AM |
| Posted By Barry on 05/02/2008 10:10 AM Â I do think that the current top 100 and top 2 qualifier system is flawed and needs work. It should be either/or, not both.
Barry Interesting, that. Do you also think that Tiger Woods should have to play in a qualifying tournament to play in the US Open? Or that Roger Federer should have to play in a qualifier for Wimbledon?
Past performance means something, doesn't it?
It is possible that the 2 invites only is flawed, or that invites not passing down is flawed. But I don't think the combination of using past performance and on-the-spot qualifying is where the flaw is. Heck, I think the year I made top 8 in the Constructed Champs was the year I qualifed based on top 50. Obviously, I showed some ability to warrant being there - that my history of performance meant at least as much as the one bad tournament I had to get there (I had a miserable showing at the one qualifier I could attend).
***
I would like for somebody who thinks top 4 is better and that slots should pass down would have gained some reasonable number of participants. Just how many more people would having changed both of those things last year would we have? Right now, we're living in perception-land. We *think* there would be a measurable increase in number of people at the champs. But I haven't seen any data to back that up. | | [http://www.hordelings.com/frontend/profiles/profile.php?user_id=22] | |
|
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.7 | You must be signed in to participate in the
games. |