Search
Thursday, November 20, 2008..:: Forums::..Register  Login
Subject: recovered topic 10028

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
AuthorMessages

Pale Rider
Underboss
Underboss
1023 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

London, Ontario, Canada

10/19/2005 11:23 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by glumag

quote:
Originally posted by Pale Rider
What difference would it make?
How many years between 1E and 2E, and then 2E and 3E and THEN 3E and 3.5E?

see the problem?





No. 3.5 wasn't a big enough change to warrent new books I agree but I notice I can use my 3.0 books in my 3.5 campaign.

Completed Trades: Crescent Hawk, Vimes, demagogue, vidman, Eric is God, Strachan Fireblade, FungiMuncher, Dudeeehm, Shasack, gausse, kyrin, nyjastul69
Champion of the Remorhaz

Pale Rider
Underboss
Underboss
1023 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

London, Ontario, Canada

10/19/2005 11:24 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by Count Dooku

quote:
What difference would it make?


The difference is in how much longer I would still be getting D&D product, Dragon and Dungeon magazines ect.

Because Im about 90% sure 4th edition is when I quit the hobby. I have to much 3rd edition product to change systems. Id just keep on playing 3rd and would stop putting money in WotC's pockets.



Huh. I have Dungeon mags from the single digits and regularly use them in my 3.5 campaign. I just can't see the logic behind this attitude (unless it is the standard 'screw da man' one).

Completed Trades: Crescent Hawk, Vimes, demagogue, vidman, Eric is God, Strachan Fireblade, FungiMuncher, Dudeeehm, Shasack, gausse, kyrin, nyjastul69
Champion of the Remorhaz

Ironballz
Sneak
Sneak
68 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


10/19/2005 2:45 PM  
D&D has always been a very clunky system compared to many other games. 3.x took some major steps in correcting it, but it still doens't have the same feel as many other games. Combat is slower, magic is clumsier and characters are highly restricted. I think if they make a 4.0, they better make a whole new magic system that works fluidly and lets characters remain versitile and adaptable.

For instance, those who have played the older Shadowrun games will know what I'm talking about. Their magic system, while complicated, was also very open ended. If there wasn't a rule for something, your character could just "try it", roll some dice and the GM said yay or nay. In D&D, if it's not a spell, tough.

I like a lot of spells and if they get rid of the good old staples, I would be disappointed, but I think it could be made a lot better too.

Champion of the Minotaur Knight
Herald of the Epic Snig

reezel
Sergeant
Sergeant
555 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


10/19/2005 3:33 PM  
I've always prayed that D&D would someday take a cue from White-wolf, particulary Mage. I love the open ended fluidity of it all. No classes to bog down doing what you want to specialize in. And the open ended magic system in D&D would be most amazing. Not sure I will ever truly see that though, which is sad.


Champion of the Beholder and Beholderkin

The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

Gristlemane
Sergeant
Sergeant
623 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


10/19/2005 9:17 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by griffrat

The word that I heard is that it (4.0) is going to be a classless version.


I have to agree with PatEllis. The potential for min/maxing and disparity between characters is huge. Skill systems are generally great for solo RPG projects like computer games, and roleplaying heavy games too. But a combat-focused game like Dungeons and Dragons could very easily be broken with a skill based system. I'm not saying that it would be impossible to balance it, just extremely difficult. If Jonothan Tweet and Skip Williams can create a new modular based RPG system that's well balanced I will consider 4E a massive achievement, but I won't hold my breath. It's simply a very difficult project.

quote:
Originally posted by forkedmoon

Personally I'm holding out for 4.01a. My last foray in was at AD&D, once they took my option to color my own monsters in my book I just wasn't as happy.


And if they have black and white monsters people will scream bloody murder that they are being ripped off by Wizards of the Coa$t, and that the company is run by a bunch of cheap b-------. In my opinion (and that's all this is- my opinion) this is a minor complaint. It's like my irritation at the "sample NPC's" given with prestige classes. Minor complaints shouldn't make you ditch a system, because you are going to have minor complaints regarding whatever system you look at.

If 4.0E is a good upgrade like the step from 2E to 3E then I will buy it. If it is more like the step from 1E to 2E I'll either stick with 3.5E or move to something else.

It's deja vu all over again.

Pale Rider
Underboss
Underboss
1023 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

London, Ontario, Canada

10/22/2005 10:41 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by Gristlemane


If 4.0E is a good upgrade like the step from 2E to 3E then I will buy it. If it is more like the step from 1E to 2E I'll either stick with 3.5E or move to something else.



Couldn't you just keep playing 3E?

Completed Trades: Crescent Hawk, Vimes, demagogue, vidman, Eric is God, Strachan Fireblade, FungiMuncher, Dudeeehm, Shasack, gausse, kyrin, nyjastul69
Champion of the Remorhaz

yack
Commander
Commander
3254 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Gatineau Canada

10/23/2005 11:46 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by Count Dooku

quote:
They'll get to 4th ed for sure. The good news is that the material will probably be available in electronic format, and upgrades will be really inexpensive for those who have been loyal 'investors' from past editions.
I just love my electronic D&D stuff. The computer finds things faster than I can, and I'm not wearing out the spine on DMG, MM or Players Manual.


You actually a minority there.
Most of us really dont like PDFs over books. Having a full shelf to feel proud of and pooring through the pages of a book is always better then reading off a screen.


Totally agree ... I sooner have a book and pay the extra money then have crappy pdf's. Its more professional looking and plus I rarley use my computer in the game itself. I use it more for lookup after game hours.D&D being nothing but laptops on the table would suck!! Pizza and beer stains on the character sheets is classic fun!

Champion of the Peryton
Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer
DW: Duergar Priest
RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM

nyjastul69
Commander
Commander
2711 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile

Rhode Island

10/23/2005 12:48 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by yack:
D&D being nothing but laptops on the table would suck!!


I agree. The DM in the Tues. game I play in uses a laptop, even rolling with it. It makes my dice sad. There's nothing like the shooka, shooka and clattering of rolling dice.[^]

quote:
Originally posted by yack:
Pizza and beer stains on the character sheets is classic fun!


I couldn't agree more.



In the constellation of
Cygnus, there lurks a
mysterious, invisible
force:

Rush

Liquidburn
Sergeant
Sergeant
944 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


11/05/2005 9:54 AM  
quote:
Originally posted by bshugg

I will be happy when 4th edition comes out. I will happily buy the core books, and review the add ons as they come out. 2nd edition greatly improved over 1st edition. 3rd edition greatly improved over 2nd edition, and 3.5 was just enough polishing to make the game wickedly good. They have a great track record going so far, I will trust their decision on when to make a new edition.



I agree but I can't say I'm sad to see it be in 2011, it'll give us a chance to get our moneys worth out of all those 3.5 books.

Jason Slingerland

"Why do I have to be Mr. Pink?"

Jimbodwarf
Sneak
Sneak
103 Posts


View Have/Want List View Trades View References View Email View Profile


11/05/2005 11:09 PM  
quote:
Originally posted by Sharn Inquisitor

Constant fear of another new edition has been the primary factor in my having not invested heavily in the new books. I have the core books, and Eberron books, but supplements (that I would like to purchase) like the 'Complete' series, are just not worth it to me b/c I don't know when they will do a new edition. The books are just too expensive to keep replacing all the damn time.


I couldn't have said it better myself [)] You go Inquisitor...

"Dorrak" of Hammer and Axe on Argonnessen in DDO
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12




ActiveForums 3.7
Play Dreamblade Now!
You must be signed in to participate in the games.
Copyright 2003-2008 by maxminis.com   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement