| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
| | Author | Messages | |
thekidxii Sergeant
 533 Posts



 No Yack. I said.. we need a DM not BM!
 | | 12/20/2006 11:57 AM |
| Has anyone created a hybrid assassin character?Â
I liked the class from 1st ed. but was quite sad to see them go along with monks.. Just got my hands on the 3.5PHB and was flipping through the pages... and was delighted to see monks are back but as I've was informed before no assassins.... Then an idea:
Select "friendly" races as your favoured enemies?
Has anyone played a character something like... "Bill" the 1/2 Elf, Ranger "Mankiller (for hire)"  ?
Anyone see any problems (rules or other) with this type of character?
*Flames welcomed & expected*Â ;-)
Cheers, thekid
| | Champion of the dire hippo. Audi Vide Tace "Nothing matters but the weekend, From a Tuesday point of view" -Diamond & Zero | |
| yack Commander
 3320 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/20/2006 12:15 PM |
| AS stated in the chat my mistake also...assassins are a prest class... but we would have to make a rule for good side assassin. The ranger idea is funny but the only problem I see is that... would you not want to kill other humans in your own party. | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| IanB Commander
 3112 Posts




 | | 12/20/2006 12:28 PM |
| Having a favored enemy doesn't mean you feel homicidal towards all creatures of that type.
Simple example: an elf ranger who wants to hunt drow takes "elf" as his favored enemy. This doesn't mean he will want to kill his brother, or even that he'll necessarily want to kill every drow he meets. It just means he knows where to stab an elf to really make it hurt. | | Anson on WotC boards | |
|  Sir Bozak The Damned Commander
 2854 Posts



 Québec
 | | 12/20/2006 12:30 PM |
| A bloodhound ( from Complete Adventurer ) would substitute for a good-aligned character like that, as would a "memory lapse" from the Complete Warrior. Wanting to kill them is not an issue per say, as that character would know that he needs the other members to survive or to use them. Being evil does not make you lose all judgment. Chaotic evil parties are possible, although not without issues.
| | Please donate BLOOD at http://www.monstersgame.co.uk/ac=vid&vid=11018554 Champion Of Kaz the Minotaur Knight of ALL Draconians. Squire Of ALL Constructs The number ONE fanatic Of Dread Guards ! I own 66 !!! And the GMR1 !!! 119 completed trades so far...NB called shot: Medusa | |
| yack Commander
 3320 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/20/2006 12:38 PM |
| Posted By IanB on 12/20/2006 12:28 PM Having a favored enemy doesn't mean you feel homicidal towards all creatures of that type.
Simple example: an elf ranger who wants to hunt drow takes "elf" as his favored enemy. This doesn't mean he will want to kill his brother, or even that he'll necessarily want to kill every drow he meets. It just means he knows where to stab an elf to really make it hurt.
Whoo never thought of it that way IanB cool thanks. I now see a new light in the tunnel. | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 12/20/2006 3:28 PM |
| Favored Enemy Human is a common choice. Not necessarily the best, but humans are a common enemy.
If you want Assassins, they are in the DMG as a prestige class, as mentioned. The great thing about 3rd ed is that a lot of the "classics" from 1st ed are back: Monk, assassin, cavalier (prestige class), druid. | | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| yack Commander
 3320 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/20/2006 4:16 PM |
| What he forgot to mention is that his group doesn't use prest. classes...  | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 12/20/2006 6:16 PM |
| | No prestige classes? Wow, that's strict. Is it limited to just the PHB as well for player options? | | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| Skyscraper Sergeant
 659 Posts



 Montreal
 | | 12/20/2006 6:49 PM |
| For a player in his first 3.X campaign, restricting the classes to core sounds reasonable to me.
Sky
| | The wise man doubts often. The ignorant, sometimes. The fool, never. | |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 12/20/2006 6:59 PM |
| Reasonable, still strict.  | | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| yack Commander
 3320 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/20/2006 7:09 PM |
| Not really strict.... just want my games to have an old school feel too it. I love 3.5 but I dislike all the fluff and the fact of over 20 books with feats and prest.classes.
Rules are more important right now instead of fluff its a new group.
Maybe down the road it will be allowed......maybe. | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 12/20/2006 8:33 PM |
| | If it works for your group, then it's great. I meant strict in terms of book selection, as you've said you're trying to keep that old school feel. All the books can get overwhelming if you are not used to them, like with a new group. As I said before, it's reasonable for a new group, just "restrictive" compared to most (not to put a value judgment on that). | | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| thekidxii Sergeant
 533 Posts



 No Yack. I said.. we need a DM not BM!
 | | 12/21/2006 5:30 AM |
| ...not restrictive (yet) as I only have the PHB at the moment. I can see some good role playing ideas that come with a "goodish" assassin. ...the kind of person who is good (according to his own moral code), but uses questionable means to get things done.
Which brings to mind another question: Does an evil person know they are evil? I'm thinking they at least believe they are a bit good. | | Champion of the dire hippo. Audi Vide Tace "Nothing matters but the weekend, From a Tuesday point of view" -Diamond & Zero | |
| sage_raistlin Sergeant
 377 Posts




 | | 12/21/2006 7:40 AM |
| | Just make a combination fighter/thief and base your skills and feats on things that would benifit being an assassin. That's one of the nice things I'm seeing with the skills/feat set ups, it allows you to really customize your PC. I can think of the uproar that there would have been for a wizard using a sword in 1st and 2nd edition and knowing how to use very well. | | Hello Boys, I'm Back Vindicated Champion of the Bat (not pretty, but it still counts) | |
| yack Commander
 3320 Posts



 Gatineau Canada
 | | 12/21/2006 8:14 AM |
| See I like Sage's idea.......... better because if I let one player use prest.classes and all will want them. I'm using the PHB/DMG/Spell Com.and the FR players guide for now. | | Champion of the Peryton Vindicated Champion : Pit Fiend, Devourer DW: Duergar Priest RPG Only!!!! The Drumming Drunkn' DM | |
| thekidxii Sergeant
 533 Posts



 No Yack. I said.. we need a DM not BM!
 | | 12/21/2006 8:21 AM |
| you're allowing multiple classes? all good then... one question: How many can I start with?  | | Champion of the dire hippo. Audi Vide Tace "Nothing matters but the weekend, From a Tuesday point of view" -Diamond & Zero | |
| Skyscraper Sergeant
 659 Posts



 Montreal
 | | 12/21/2006 8:30 AM |
| Multi-class is neither better nor worse than single class at the outset. It's much better thought out than the 1st Ed multi-classing.
This being said, i agree that it is restrictive to confine players to core classes only. This is what i do in my 3 present campaigns nonetheless I like core classes, what can i say! A few years down the road, when these and other campaigns are completed, we'll see if we want to expand beyond that. For the time being, all players but one, out of seven, prefer that we stick to core classes only.
Sky | | The wise man doubts often. The ignorant, sometimes. The fool, never. | |
| gss_000 Commander
 3204 Posts



 Baltimore, MD
 | | 12/21/2006 8:32 AM |
| Posted By thekidxii on 12/21/2006 5:30 AM
Which brings to mind another question: Does an evil person know they are evil? I'm thinking they at least believe they are a bit good. Book of Vile Darkness (BoVD) has a great section on what is Evil in D&D. Unlike some games, D&D as written (not necesarily as played) has a strict line of what is good and what is evil. It then goes on to describe motivations for evil in the game. Now, you can easily say "I'm doing this for the greater good", nothing stops you from determining your motivation, but you still are doing evil and would take damage as an evil creature if your alignment is deignated as evil. If not, your DM may make you take some conseuences (paladin and clerics losing abilites, for instance)
Sometimes this motivation can cause great roleplaying and character interaction. I had a character like this in another game and after seeing the extreme of this philosophy stopped his own actions that were similar.
| | Completed trades: blackthorne, Drakkengi,Thorgrin, Ironfist Boulderbender x2, ckissee, nasamonkey, Username, Star, Ace13 x3, emontedodger x2, Drconveyor, church, Joeyb, Sir Bozak The Damned, Xeromod, the other guy x2, Qucalion of Celene, Dagaron x2, berus316, qillan_dvra, AshloreDarkShadow
For further info go to My Reference Thread and Trade Interface
Champion of Radiant Sevant | |
| tourette's Skirmisher
 24 Posts



 Colorado
 | | 01/05/2007 2:22 PM |
| I have been running a couple of home campaigns for the past three years - one in Midnight and one Greyhawk (D&D101). I allow all of the classes and the pressed cheese classes. Luckily, not many of my players are interested in the Prestige classes. Out of all of the PC's, maybe 5-10% of them will use a Prestige or multi-class.
As far as the Assassin goes, I created my first one a while back. 5th level Rogue, 3rd level Assassin. I have enjoyed playing him but depending on the adventure, sometimes he wasn't much more than a rogue. In one case we were double crossed by a shady NPC (Never trust a NPC) and I hunted him down in the pub later, turned invisible, studied him for three rounds, snuck up, stabbed him in the junk (Re-appeared briefly for an uncomfortable moment) and turned invisible again for a quick getaway before the locals could react. It was fun. Of course, anyone can play the part of an assassin without the class as I learned when one of the PC's, a fighter, poisoned the NPC who hired them to accomplish a job for him when it was done. | | | |
|
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.7 | You must be signed in to participate in the
games. |